威尔豪森的《以色列史导论》与现代圣经批评——历史记忆、断裂与重构中的《摩西五经》
发布时间：2018-10-08 11:31
【摘要】：现代圣经批评始于启蒙运动与唯理主义时期对《摩西五经》的质疑。之后,各种底本假说迭兴。威尔豪森的《以色列史导论》出版则标志着现代圣经批评学的确立。通过对圣经中崇拜地点、祭献、节期和祭司利未人做翔实的历史考察,威尔豪森令人信服地论证了《摩西五经》最后成书于流放后这一事实。威尔豪森之后,对威尔豪森的批评和质疑构成了现代圣经批评重要内容,但关于《摩西五经》何以成典,何以为经?仍然是一个悬而未决、争论不休的热点。从历史记忆、断裂与重构的角度重新对之考察,一些旷日持久的争论或将得到合理的解决。
[Abstract]:Modern biblical criticism began during the Enlightenment and rationalism to question the five Scriptures of Moses. Since then, various underlying hypotheses have emerged. Wilson's introduction to the History of Israel marks the establishment of modern biblical criticism. Through a thorough historical examination of places of worship in the Bible, offerings, feasts, and the Levites, Wilhausen convincingly demonstrated the fact that the five Scriptures of Moses ended up in exile. After Wilson, the criticism and questioning of Wilson constituted an important part of modern biblical criticism. But what about the five scriptures of Moses? It is still an unresolved and controversial hot spot. From the perspective of historical memory, fracture and reconstruction, some protracted disputes may be reasonably resolved.
【作者单位】： 南京大学历史学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目《〈摩西五经〉与〈周礼〉的跨文本比较研究》(批号:12BZJ018)阶段性成果 江苏省“青蓝工程” 南大人文基金的资助
【分类号】：B971
本文编号：2256584
[Abstract]:Modern biblical criticism began during the Enlightenment and rationalism to question the five Scriptures of Moses. Since then, various underlying hypotheses have emerged. Wilson's introduction to the History of Israel marks the establishment of modern biblical criticism. Through a thorough historical examination of places of worship in the Bible, offerings, feasts, and the Levites, Wilhausen convincingly demonstrated the fact that the five Scriptures of Moses ended up in exile. After Wilson, the criticism and questioning of Wilson constituted an important part of modern biblical criticism. But what about the five scriptures of Moses? It is still an unresolved and controversial hot spot. From the perspective of historical memory, fracture and reconstruction, some protracted disputes may be reasonably resolved.
【作者单位】： 南京大学历史学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目《〈摩西五经〉与〈周礼〉的跨文本比较研究》(批号:12BZJ018)阶段性成果 江苏省“青蓝工程” 南大人文基金的资助
【分类号】：B971
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 陈贻绎;;威尔豪森对早期以色列历史的研究[J];东方论坛;2013年05期
2 保尔·博尚;李夏裔;;评“洪典—圣经与文学”[J];法国研究;1986年03期
3 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2256584
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/2256584.html
