东正教会对伏尔泰圣经批判的驳斥——以帕里奥斯的《解药》为例

发布时间：2019-03-17 17:12

【摘要】：18世纪末,以自然神论为基础的伏尔泰的圣经批判传入了启蒙时期的希腊,因其对圣经启示真理及基督教三位一体、道成肉身等教义的否定引发了东正教人士的普遍不满与反驳。然而以往有关希腊启蒙时期的历史书写出于对启蒙价值的认同,不仅不会过多关注这一时期的反启蒙因素,而且还倾向于笼统地批判这些反启蒙意见,使其不能获得自身语境内的解读与理解。本文以这一时期一部典型的驳斥伏尔泰圣经批判的东正教护教作品(帕里奥斯的《解药》)为主要研究对象,尝试从帕里奥斯所秉承的源于希腊教父的二元知识论出发,分析解读他对启蒙唯理性主义和实证主义解经模式的质疑与批评。
[Abstract]:At the end of the 18th century, Voltaire's biblical criticism, based on the theism of nature, was introduced to Greece during the Enlightenment period, because it revealed truth and Christianity to the Bible in a trinity. The negation of the teachings of the Taoist body caused widespread dissatisfaction and rebuttal among the Orthodox. However, the historical writing of Greek enlightenment period in the past, out of recognition of the enlightenment value, not only does not pay much attention to the anti-enlightenment factors of this period, but also tends to criticize these anti-enlightenment opinions in a general way. So that they can not obtain the interpretation and understanding within their own language. This paper focuses on a typical Orthodox orthodox work which refutes Voltaire's biblical criticism (the antidote of Parios) and tries to start from the theory of dual knowledge derived from the Greek Patristic Patriarch, which was inherited by Parios. This paper analyzes and interprets his doubts and criticisms on the model of enlightenment rationalism and positivism.
【作者单位】：北京大学历史系;
【分类号】：B976.2

【相似文献】