我国刑事证据开示制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-08 02:00

本文关键词：我国刑事证据开示制度研究　出处：《河北大学》2007年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 证据开示来源于英美法系的概念,是当事人主义对抗制诉讼中的一项重要制度。传统上采用当事人主义的英美法系国家如英国、美国,都以成文法、法院规则或判例法的形式规定了证据开示制度,原来属于大陆法系的日本和意大利,在刑事诉讼构造由职权主义转向当事人主义之后,也在立法上相应地设置了有关证据开示方面的规定,确立了各有特色的证据开示制度。我国1996年修改的《刑事诉讼法》,在很大程度上借鉴了当事人主义诉讼模式的合理因素,使其成为以职权主义传统为基调、吸收当事人主义对抗制因素的诉讼模式。虽然《刑事诉讼法》及有关的司法解释已有一些类似于证据开示的规定,但是,这些规定是不完善的,还存在许多问题和不足,已根本不能适应现实需要,立法也明显滞后于实践。证据开示已成为我国刑事诉讼所面临的一个十分突出的,可能妨碍诉讼公正和诉讼效率的迫切问题。因此,完善证据开示制度已势在必行。本文以证据开示的概念和理论基础为出发点,在借鉴国外的刑事证据开示制度的基础上,论证了完善我国证据开示制度的必要性,对构建有中国特色的证据开示制度以及相关配套措施的完善等问题进行了初步的探讨,使之有利于立法完善和司法实践。
[Abstract]:The discovery of evidence originates from the concept of Anglo-American legal system and is an important system in the adversarial action of litigant doctrine. The countries of Anglo-American legal system that have traditionally adopted party-ism such as Britain and the United States use written law. The form of court rules or case law prescribes the system of discovery of evidence. Japan and Italy, which originally belong to the continental law system, changed the structure of criminal proceedings from functionalism to party-ism. In the legislation, the relevant provisions of evidence disclosure are set up, and the system of evidence discovery with its own characteristics is established. The Criminal procedure Law revised in 1996, to a great extent, draws lessons from the reasonable factors of the litigant litigation mode, and makes it become the tone of the tradition of the doctrine of authority. Although the Criminal procedure Law and the related judicial interpretation have some similar provisions to the discovery of evidence, these provisions are not perfect. There are still many problems and deficiencies, which can not adapt to the actual needs, legislation is obviously lagging behind the practice. Evidence disclosure has become a very prominent criminal proceedings in China. Therefore, it is imperative to perfect the system of discovery of evidence. Based on the concept and theoretical basis of evidence discovery, this paper demonstrates the necessity of perfecting the evidence discovery system in China on the basis of drawing lessons from the foreign criminal evidence discovery system. This paper makes a preliminary discussion on the construction of evidence discovery system with Chinese characteristics and the perfection of relevant supporting measures, so as to make it conducive to legislative perfection and judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】