网络隐私侵权管辖权研究

发布时间：2018-01-15 14:07

本文关键词：网络隐私侵权管辖权研究　出处：《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文是关于网络环境下隐私侵权案件管辖权问题的一篇论文,文章首先对网络隐私侵权的概念进行了界定,并阐述了现行管辖权体制在应对网络隐私侵权案件时所面临的问题,接着分析了互联网技术发展较快的美国、欧洲在网络侵权案件管辖权问题上的立法和司法实践,对国际上涌现出的确定网络隐私侵权案件管辖权的新理论和新依据进行了评价,在以上分析研究的过程中阐述了自己关于这一问题的一些思考,最后针对我国关于这一问题的立法司法现状,分析了我国的现有制度在网络隐私侵权案件中的适用价值及其存在的问题,提出了相应的完善建议,对我国网络隐私侵权案件管辖制度的构建做了有益的探索。本文共分为四个部分:第一章首先对网络隐私侵权行为的概念和构成进行了界定,阐述了互联网的电子虚拟性、无国界性等特性给传统管辖权理论的适用带来的问题,指出传统的管辖权理论已经不能合理有效的应对网络环境下的隐私侵权案件。第二章对目前国际上存在的关于网络隐私侵权案件管辖权问题的四种理论进行了评价,对网址的互动性、服务器所在地、侵权行为地、原告所在地等确定网络隐私侵权案件管辖权的依据进行了分析论证,指出了其中的不合理、不可行之处,为构建实际可行的网络隐私侵权案件管辖模式做了必要的探讨。第三章主要分析了互联网发展较为迅速的美国、欧洲在网络隐私侵权案件管辖权问题上的立法和司法实践,以及欧盟议会16年通过的《一般数据保护条例》关于这一问题的立法进展。重点分析了美国的“长臂管辖权”原则应用在网络隐私侵权案件中的价值,及其在司法实践中逐渐形成的“进一步活动说”、“滑动标尺法”等在确定网络隐私侵权案件管辖权时的可借鉴性,并论述了欧洲关于网络侵权案件管辖权的立法与司法实践及趋势。第四章对我国网络隐私侵权案件管辖权制度的现状进行了分析,指出了我国立法及司法实践中存在的主要问题,在前三章分析的基础上提出对我国网络隐私侵权案件管辖权制度的完善建议,从而使我国现有管辖权制度得以合理有效地应对网络隐私侵权案件。本文的创新之处在于在分析问题、解决问题的过程中注重考虑我国的现实情况,没有完全否定我国现有的制度在应对网络隐私侵权案件时的价值,并从有效解决纠纷、有利于互联网发展的角度去权衡各种可借鉴模式的引入可能对我国产生的影响。
[Abstract]:This is a thesis about the jurisdiction under the environment of network privacy infringement cases, this article first defines the concept of network privacy infringement, and expounds the current jurisdiction system faces in dealing with network privacy infringement cases of the problem, and then analyzes the Internet technology rapid development of the United States, Europe in the jurisdiction of Internet infringement the case on the issue of legislation and judicial practice, new theory and new evidence for the emergence of international network privacy tort jurisdiction was evaluated, in the above analysis process explained his thinking about this problem, finally according to our country legislation on the status of this issue, analysis the existing system of our country the value of application in network privacy tort cases and existing problems, puts forward corresponding suggestions on China's Internet privacy infringement case The construction is explored a jurisdiction system. This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter firstly the concept of network privacy tort behavior and defines the electronic virtual nature of the Internet, without borders and other characteristics to the traditional theory of jurisdiction for problems, pointed out that the response to the environment of the traditional network the jurisdiction theory is not reasonable and effective under the privacy infringement cases. The second chapter is the evaluation of the four kinds of theories about the jurisdiction of Internet privacy infringement problems exist at present in the world, the interaction of the web site, server location, tort, etc. to determine where the jurisdiction of Internet privacy on the basis of infringement cases are analyzed, pointed out the unreasonable, is not practical, do the necessary research for the model construction of practical network privacy infringement cases under the jurisdiction of the third chapter. The main analysis of the Internet more rapid development of the United States, European jurisdiction in Internet privacy infringement cases on the issue of legislation and judicial practice and legislation on the general data protection regulations of the European Parliament for 16 years by the < > on this issue. The key point is the analysis of America's "long arm jurisdiction" principle in the application of network privacy tort in the case of value in judicial practice and gradually formed the "additional activity", "reference in determining the network privacy infringement cases jurisdiction of the sliding scale method, and discusses the European jurisdiction on internet infringement cases of the legislative and judicial practice and trend. The fourth chapter analyses the status of jurisdiction the right system of China's Internet privacy infringement cases, and points out the main problems of legislation and judicial practice in our country, based on the three chapter on the analysis put forward to our country network hidden Right of private tort cases under the jurisdiction of the suggestions, so that the existing jurisdiction system in our country can reasonably and effectively deal with the network privacy infringement cases. The innovation of this paper is to analyze problems, focus on the reality of our country in the process of solving the problems, not completely deny the value of China's existing system in response to network privacy tort when the case, and the effective resolution of disputes, is conducive to the development of the Internet into perspective to weigh all of the reference model may have impacts on China.

【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】