当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 社科硕士论文 >

安全生产法律关系主体研究

发布时间:2018-05-02 05:18

  本文选题:安全生产 + 法律关系主体 ; 参考:《天津工业大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:以法理学与经济法学的法律关系主体理论为基础,结合现行安全生产法的具体规定,我国的安全生产法律关系主体主要包括生产经营行为主体、安全监管主体、社会主体和劳动主体四类。生产经营行为主体即实施生产经营行为,包括各类生产、使用、经营、运输和存储行为的行为主体。安全监管主体,即安全生产监督管理主体,是安全生产法上依法履行对保证生产经营行为安全实施的外部监督管理职责的公权力主体。社会主体是安全生产法体现新时期安全生产社会共治理论以及经济法中"政府—社会—市场"三维层次理论的重要法律关系主体。劳动主体是依法与生产经营单位建立劳动法律关系从事生产经营劳动,并依据安全生产法具有安全生产权利和义务的主体。以上四类主体之间基于一定的法学原理发生的具有安全管理法律意义的结构性关系的整体,可以认为是安全生产法上构建的具体的多维主体框架结构。生产经营行为对安全要素的有效配置是这一多维主体框架结构的价值核心,安全管理职能的协调分配是这一多维主体框架结构的中心线索。生产经营单位应当承担本体性的安全管理职能对单位的生产经营行为采取自我保障安全的管理措施;安全监管主体应当凭借一定的主体结构构建和权力形式配置,实现一种行为主体外部的强制性公权力安全监管;社会主体作为脱胎于市民社会处于市民社会与政治国家中间层的相对独立的主体则应当承担一定的参与安全监督和管理的职能;劳动主体基于劳动安全本身的价值重要性和相对独立性,应当通过一定的劳动安全权利义务配置,对生产经营单位的劳动安全乃至整个生产安全保障发挥能动的主体功能。在各自明确承担一定的安全管理职能的基础上,协调各自的安全管理职能的发挥是这一多维主体框架结构的重点。本体性的安全管理是一种相对的生产经营行为安全保障闭环机制,但同时应当接受来自外部的公权力安全监管、社会主体参与安全监督和管理以及来自内部的劳动安全监督管理的不同程度的约束;公权力安全监管是公权力因素作用于安全生产法的体现,也是彰显经济法价值精神的标志之一。这一安全监管既应当辅助协调本体性安全管理,又应当组织协调社会主体的参与安全监督和管理,同时也应当积极依法接受源自社会的参与安全监督管理的各种参与意见和参与决策;社会主体的参与安全监督和管理作为一种社会性、参与性的安全监督和管理,需要在与本体性安全管理和公权力安全监管的相互联系、相互作用下发挥其功能,作用到对生产经营行为配置安全要素的干预之上;劳动主体的劳动安全权利义务下的在单位内部的安全管理和监督凭借与本体性安全管理的相互联系和相互作用,发挥相应的安全管理功能和意义。诚然,在一定意义上讲安全生产法的多维主体框架结构本身也是一种围绕生产经营行为配置安全要素这一价值核心的多元安全管理职能分配架构。很大程度上而言,未来的安全生产法主体机制的改革与发展,也是围绕着如何更加优化的分配各自的安全管理职能而展开的。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the subject theory of legal relations between jurisprudence and economic law, combining with the specific provisions of current safety production law, the main body of the legal relationship of safety production in our country mainly includes the main body of production and operation, the main body of safety supervision, the social subject and the four types of labor subject. The main body of the behavior of production, use, operation, transportation and storage. The subject of safety supervision, that is, the subject of safety production supervision and management, is the main body of public power in the safety production law to perform the external supervision and management of the safety of production and operation in accordance with the law. The social subject is the safety production law embodying the social security of the new period of production. The main body of legal relations in the theory of governance and the three-dimensional theory of "government - Society - market" in economic law. The main body of labor is the subject of establishing labor legal relations with the production and operating units according to law, and the subject of safe production rights and obligations according to the safety production law. The four types of subjects are based on a certain law. The whole of the structural relationship with the legal meaning of security management can be considered as the concrete multi-dimensional body frame structure built on the safety production law. The effective allocation of the production and operation behavior to the security elements is the core of the multidimensional main frame structure, and the coordination allocation of the security management function is the multidimensional The central clue of the main frame structure. The production and operation unit should undertake the self security management measures for the production and operation behavior of the unit, and the main body of the security supervision should rely on the construction of a certain main body structure and the configuration of the power form, so as to realize a compulsory public power security outside the subject of the behavior. The social subject, as a relatively independent subject, which is born out of the civil society and the middle level of the political state, should undertake certain functions to participate in the safety supervision and management, and the labor subject, based on the value importance and relative independence of labor safety itself, should be matched by certain labor safety rights and obligations. On the basis of specific security management functions, coordination of their respective security management functions is the key point of this multi-dimensional main frame structure. The ontological security management is a relative production and management. The closed loop mechanism of behavior safety guarantees, but at the same time, the public power and security supervision from the outside should be accepted, the social subject participates in the safety supervision and management as well as the internal labor safety supervision and management of different degrees. The public power and safety supervision is the embodiment of the public power factor acting on Yu An's whole production law and the value of the economic law. One of the symbols of the spirit. This security supervision should assist in coordinating the management of the security of the body, and organizing and coordinating the participation of the social subjects in the safety supervision and management, and should also actively accept all kinds of participation opinions and participation decisions from the social participation in safety supervision and management according to law, and the participation of social subjects in safety supervision and management. As a social, participatory security supervision and management needs to be interconnected with the security management of ontological security and public power and security, to play its function under the interaction and to interfere with the security factors of the disposition of the production and operation behavior; and the safety management within the unit under the labor safety rights and obligations of the labor subject. And supervision relies on the mutual connection and interaction with the ontology security management to play the corresponding security management function and significance. Indeed, in a sense, the multidimensional body framework of safety production law is also a multi security management function distribution framework which is the core of the value core of the production and operation behavior. To a large extent, the reform and development of the main mechanism of the future safety production law also revolves around how to optimize the distribution of their respective security management functions.

【学位授予单位】:天津工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.54

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 莫纪宏;;国外安全生产法律制度简介[J];中国审判;2013年07期

2 慕庆国;;安全管理的国内外研究现状分析[J];山东工商学院学报;2012年02期

3 胡建淼;;“行政强制措施”与“行政强制执行”的分界[J];中国法学;2012年02期

4 向春玲;;论多种社会主体在社会管理创新中的作用[J];中共中央党校学报;2011年05期

5 葛道顺;;中国社会组织发展:从社会主体到国家意识——公民社会组织发展及其对意识形态构建的影响[J];江苏社会科学;2011年03期

6 庞正;;法律关系基础理论问题论辩[J];法治研究;2010年06期

7 曲新久;;论刑法中的“公共安全”[J];人民检察;2010年09期

8 俞可平;;中国公民社会研究的若干问题[J];中共中央党校学报;2007年06期

9 陶爱萍;;论安全生产法的价值取向[J];生产力研究;2007年21期

10 何侍昌;;对我国安全生产责任制建设的思考[J];安全生产与监督;2006年06期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 王婷;我国煤矿安全生产法律问题研究[D];湖南大学;2007年



本文编号:1832516

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1832516.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户75da0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com