完善我国建设工程款支付保障制度研究
发布时间:2018-05-09 11:29
本文选题:建设工程款 + 支付保障 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:建筑业作为国民经济的支柱产业,关系着人们生活水平的提高、国民经济的稳定健康发展。但是建设工程款支付过程中的拖欠问题却是阻碍建筑业健康发展的顽疾,它不仅影响建筑企业自身壮大,阻碍社会信用体系建立的进程,而且建设工程款久拖不决势必会影响到农民工工资的正常发放,不利于社会主义和谐社会的建立。为此,政府部门陆续颁布了一系列政策、采取了一些行政手段,虽在短期内取得了一些成效,但只是治标不治本。工程款拖欠问题产生的根源在于我国现有的工程款支付保障措施存在缺陷。目前我国主要的保障措施包括:建设项目资金落实相关规定、工程款支付相关规定、建设工程优先受偿权制度以及业主支付担保制度,但是由于它们存在缺陷或不足而执行效果不佳。在建设项目资金落实这一规定中,没有明确资金落实的具体标准和违反该规定的法律后果,导致行政监管出现漏洞。对工程款支付相关规定比较详细的《建设工程价款结算暂行办法》因法律位阶太低而执行不畅,而位阶较高的《中华人民共和国建筑法》(下称《建筑法》)以及《中华人民共和国合同法》(下称《合同法》)对此规定得比较粗糙,操作性不强。我国《合同法》第二百八十六条确定了建设工程优先受偿权制度,但是并有明确优先权的性质,在理论界引发了一系列争议;另外,对于该制度规定得比较原则,虽然后来最高人民法院出台了司法解释对该制度进行了细化,但是并未形成一个完整体系,且司法解释本身存在一些不尽合理之处,大大影响了该制度功能的发挥。而对于业主支付担保制度,虽然国家近年来大力提倡,但是只是散见于一些政策文件中,并没有形成法律的强制性规定,执行效果有限。因此,有必要在充分借鉴、吸收域外各国关于工程款支付保障制度有益经验的基础上,进一步完善我国建设工程支付保障体系,最终实现对工程款拖欠问题标本兼治的目的。
[Abstract]:As the pillar industry of the national economy, the construction industry is related to the improvement of people's living standard and the steady and healthy development of the national economy. However, the problem of arrears in the process of payment of construction funds is a persistent disease that hinders the healthy development of the construction industry. It not only affects the construction enterprises themselves, but also hinders the process of the establishment of the social credit system. Moreover, the delay of construction money will inevitably affect the normal distribution of migrant workers' wages, which is not conducive to the establishment of a harmonious socialist society. As a result, government departments have successively promulgated a series of policies and adopted some administrative measures. Although they have achieved some results in the short term, they have only dealt with the symptoms and not the root causes. The origin of the problem lies in the defects of the existing payment guarantee measures in our country. At present, the main safeguards in our country include: the implementation of relevant provisions on construction project funds, the relevant provisions on the payment of project funds, the system of priority payment of construction projects and the payment guarantee system of owners. However, due to their shortcomings or deficiencies, the implementation effect is not good. In the implementation of construction project funds, there are no specific standards for the implementation of funds and the legal consequences of violating the provisions, which leads to loopholes in administrative supervision. The Provisional measures for the settlement of Construction Project Price, which are relatively detailed and related to the payment of project funds, are not implemented smoothly because the legal rank is too low, On the other hand, the "Building Law of the people's Republic of China" (hereinafter referred to as the "Building Law") and the "contract Law of the people's Republic of China" (hereinafter referred to as the "contract Law") are relatively rough and not easy to operate. Article 286 of the contract Law of China establishes the system of priority compensation for construction projects, but it also has a clear nature of priority, which has caused a series of disputes in the theoretical circle. Although the Supreme people's Court later introduced a judicial interpretation to refine the system, but did not form a complete system, and there are some unreasonable judicial interpretation itself, greatly affected the function of the system. However, in recent years, the payment guarantee system is advocated by the government, but it is only scattered in some policy documents, and has not formed the mandatory provisions of the law, and the effect of enforcement is limited. Therefore, it is necessary to further improve the payment guarantee system of construction projects in our country on the basis of drawing lessons from and absorbing the beneficial experiences of foreign countries on the payment guarantee system of engineering payment, and finally achieve the purpose of treating the problem of project payment arrears at both the root and the root of the problem.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 何红锋;符廷康;;对施工合同承包人占有已竣工工程的探讨[J];天津大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
2 刘伊生;王小龙;陈忠林;;国外工程担保制度及其启示[J];工程管理学报;2010年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 肖芳林;建设领域拖欠工程款问题解决机制研究[D];湖南大学;2007年
2 吴红杰;建设工程领域工程款拖欠问题解决机制研究[D];重庆大学;2007年
3 江瑶;拖欠工程款法律问题研究[D];福州大学;2006年
4 殷薇;建设工程业主支付担保机制研究[D];同济大学;2006年
5 范珉;建设领域拖欠工程款问题解决机制研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2004年
,本文编号:1865850
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1865850.html