明显不当行政行为的司法审查标准研究

发布时间：2018-06-04 00:00

本文选题：明显不当行政行为 + 司法审查标准　；参考：《长春理工大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2014年,《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》(以下简称《行政诉讼法》)进行了修改,修改后的《行政诉讼法》第七十条第(六)项规定:“被诉行政行为明显不当的,人民法院判决撤销或者部分撤销,并可以判决被告重新作出行政行为。”将行政行为的合理性纳入司法审查范围。针对行政过程中出现的问题,规范司法权的同时敦促行政自由裁量权的规范化行使,维护行政相对人合法权益,保证其监督权和知情权,把行政自由裁量权、行政合理性原则、行政自由裁量权司法审查标准等有机结合起来,保证行政执法的科学性、合理性和目的性统一结合起来,为落实依法治国的国策迈出切实有力的关键一步。本文试图对明显不当行政行为的概念予以界定,并提出明显不当行政行为的司法审查标准,为规避不当行为的发生,规范行政自由裁量权行使,对明确明显不当行政行为审查标准提供参考建议。
[Abstract]:In 2014, the Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Administrative Litigation Law) was amended. Article 70 (6) of the amended Administrative procedure Law stipulates: "where the administrative act is obviously improper, The people's court may, by judgment or partial revocation, order the defendant to make a new administrative act. " The rationality of administrative act should be brought into the scope of judicial review. In view of the problems in the administrative process, we should standardize the judicial power and urge the administrative discretion to be exercised in a standardized way, to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, to ensure its right of supervision and to know, and to put the principle of administrative discretion and administrative reasonableness. The combination of administrative discretion and judicial review standards to ensure the scientific rationality and purpose of administrative law enforcement is a key step to implement the national policy of governing the country according to law. This paper tries to define the concept of obvious improper administrative act and put forward the standard of judicial review of obvious improper administrative act, in order to avoid the occurrence of improper act and standardize the exercise of administrative discretion. To clear the obvious improper administrative conduct review standard to provide the reference suggestion.
【学位授予单位】：长春理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】