论我国刑法中的聚众斗殴行为

发布时间：2018-08-07 10:32

【摘要】：聚众斗殴行为是指聚集多人攻击对方身体或者相互攻击对方身体的行为。该行为具有行为主体的多众性、行为的暴力性和行为的结果复合性等特征。聚众斗殴行为是司法实践中常见的犯罪行为,但是此行为具体的发生情况复杂多样,因此,对该行为的实务认定上也存在不同做法。“聚众斗殴行为”是单一行为,只包含“斗殴”这一个行为要素。聚众斗殴行为中“聚众”是指伴随着斗殴行为多人会合或集合形成的给一方安宁造成现实威胁的一种客观情势。“聚众”的界定问题上,人数要足以达到侵害一方安宁的程度,3人以上只是一个数量上的参考标准;人数的范围以斗殴行为着手开始计算,双方共同“聚”即各方相互攻击对方身体时是否构成“众”要考虑各方的参与人数之和,在单方的“聚”即多众一方单纯攻击对方身体的情况下,则只能认定多众一方的人数是否符合人数要求;聚众斗殴行为中的“斗殴”是指以有形力对他人进行击打,能妨碍他人原本的意志自由,甚至造成他人轻伤以内结果的行为。其不以对合性为必要,单方聚众斗殴也是其表现形态,发生场所不一定要限制在公共场所内。在聚众斗殴行为与相关行为的界限上,要充分考虑到行为本身的特殊性与刑法的不完善性,一般情况下考察行为的特点进行区分,特殊情况下合理运用想象竞合进行认定。聚众斗殴行为与随意殴打他人寻衅滋事行为的界限,在于后者发生不以“聚众”存在为必要且发生原因和行为对象具有随意性。聚众斗殴行为与聚众扰乱社会秩序行为的客观样态不同,前者行为手段仅限于暴力性的殴打,而后者扰乱行为没有方式限制;前者发生场合没有限制,后者必须发生在工作、生产、营业和教学、科研场所中。聚众斗殴行为与组织、领导、参加黑色会性质组织犯罪行为相比而言,行为人之间欠缺组织性,行为意图更为直接以及行为样态上更为简单。聚众斗殴行为与故意伤害行为、故意杀人行为都可以是以殴打的方式实施,但从行为人殴打的力度、使用的工具等可以看出斗殴行为对公共秩序造成的损害更大,对人身的损害不如后二者行为那样有具体性和目标性。
[Abstract]:Affray is the act of gathering more than one person to attack each other's body or to attack each other's body. The behavior is characterized by the multiplicity of the behavior subject, the violence of the behavior and the resultant compounding of the behavior. Affray is a common criminal act in judicial practice, but the concrete occurrence of this behavior is complex and diverse. Therefore, there are different ways to identify the behavior in practice. The act of affray is a single act, which contains only one element of action. In the behavior of affray, "gathering together" refers to an objective situation which is formed by the meeting or gathering of many people to pose a realistic threat to one party's tranquility. When it comes to the definition of "congregation", the number of people should be sufficient to reach the level of infringing the peace of one party or more than three people is only a quantitative reference standard; the scope of the number begins to be calculated by the act of brawl. The common "gathering" of the two sides means whether each side constitutes a "crowd" when attacking each other's bodies. In the case of a unilateral "gathering" in which more than one party simply attacks the body of the other party, it is necessary to consider the sum of the number of participants on each side. Then we can only determine whether the number of people on many sides meets the requirements of the number of people; the "affray" in the action of affray refers to the act of beating others with tangible force, which can interfere with the original freedom of will of others, and even cause the result of minor injury to others. It is not necessary to be involutive, the unilateral affray is also its manifestation, the place of occurrence does not have to be restricted in the public place. In the boundary between the affray behavior and the related behavior, the particularity of the behavior itself and the imperfection of the criminal law should be fully taken into account. In general, the characteristics of the behavior should be investigated and the characteristics of the behavior should be distinguished. The boundary between affray and random beatings lies in the fact that the latter is not necessary for the existence of "gathering a crowd", and the cause and object of the behavior are arbitrary. The behavior of affray is different from the objective appearance of the behavior of gathering people to disturb the social order. The former acts are limited to violent beatings, while the latter has no restrictions on the manner of disturbance; the former has no restrictions on the occasions in which it occurs, and the latter must take place at work. Production, business and teaching, scientific research sites. Compared with organized behavior, organization, leadership and participation in black society, the behavior of organized crime is lack of organization, behavior intention is more direct and behavior is simpler. Affray behavior and intentional injury behavior, intentional killing behavior can be carried out by beating, but from the intensity of assault and the tools used, we can see that the affray behavior causes more damage to public order. The damage to the person is not as specific and objective as the latter two behaviors.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】