公共领域的道德缺失问题研究
发布时间:2018-03-21 22:25
本文选题:公共领域 切入点:道德缺失 出处:《西安外国语大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:与私人领域相对的公共领域,是介于国家与社会之间的一个公共空间,并随着社会经济的发展与公众之间建立了越来越密切的关系。在这个空间内公众之间就某个或某些大家共同关心的话题进行评判,以求达成共识,但公共领域运行的顺利与否在一定程度上与该领域的每一个参与者对道德准则的接受与执行程度密切相关。随着市场经济体制的确立与不断完善,我国的经济出现了史无前例的快速增长,人们的物质生活水平在不断提高与改善。然而,在经济快速发展的背后,人们在公共领域中表现出的道德意识却没有得到相应的提高,公共道德的引导作用被削弱了,甚至影响了经济社会的发展。转型社会时期的公共性扩张产生了相应的对社会公共生活规则与秩序的普遍需求,但由于人们价值取向的多样化特征,出现了公共生活规则的统一性要求与个体生活多样化之间的矛盾冲突。探寻公共领域道德缺失的原因,并提出有效的对策,对于构建和谐社会,对于社会的可持续发展无疑具有重要的意义。 公共领域的道德缺失主要体现在社会生活、社会文化、政治、经济等四个领域。在社会生活领域,仍然存在着诸如破坏公共设施、乱扔东西等现象;人们在虚拟网络社区中的交流缺乏信任。在社会文化领域,电视、报刊的内容存在娱乐庸俗化现象;新闻工作者制造假新闻,对报道对象收取额外费用;在学术领域,,立项、评奖等活动也有弄虚作假的情况。在政治领域,公共权力被滥用。在社会经济领域,企业与企业、企业与消费者之间缺乏诚信、表现出制假售假等缺乏社会良知,唯利是图的情况。 长期以来,国内外学者对公共领域道德缺失进行了广泛、深入的探讨,其探讨涉及到了多个学科,但是,随着社会经济的发展,新情况,新问题的不断出现,公共领域道德缺失问题并未得到根本解决。 本文主要通过文献研究法、唯物辩证法、观察法对公共领域道德缺失的现状进行阐述与分析,最终试图从健全社会公共生活领域伦理,建立公共权力滥用的制约机制,完善市场伦理等三个方面找到解决道德缺失的对策。
[Abstract]:The public sphere, as opposed to the private sphere, is a public space between the state and society. And with the development of society and economy, the relationship between the public and the public has become closer and closer. In this space, the public will judge one or some of the topics of common concern in order to reach a consensus. However, the smooth operation of the public sphere to a certain extent is closely related to the acceptance and implementation of moral norms by every participant in the field. With the establishment and continuous improvement of the market economy system, The economy of our country has experienced unprecedented rapid growth, and people's material living standards are constantly improving and improving. However, behind the rapid economic development, people's moral consciousness in the public sphere has not been correspondingly improved. The guiding role of public morality has been weakened and even affected the economic and social development. The public expansion in the transitional society has resulted in a corresponding general demand for the rules and order of social public life. However, due to the diversified characteristics of people's value orientation, there is a contradiction between the unity requirement of public life rules and the diversity of individual life. This paper explores the causes of moral deficiency in the public sphere, and puts forward effective countermeasures. For the construction of a harmonious society, for the sustainable development of society is undoubtedly of great significance. The moral deficiency in the public sphere is mainly reflected in the four fields of social life, social culture, politics and economy. In the field of social life, there are still phenomena such as destroying public facilities and throwing things around. There is a lack of trust in people's communication in the virtual online community. In the field of social culture, there is entertainment vulgarization in the content of television and newspapers; journalists make false news and charge extra fees to those who report; and in the academic field, projects are established. In the political field, public power is abused, in the social and economic fields, between enterprises and enterprises, between enterprises and consumers, there is a lack of integrity, showing a lack of social conscience, such as counterfeiting, selling counterfeits, etc. A mercenary situation. For a long time, scholars at home and abroad have carried out extensive and in-depth discussions on moral deficiencies in the public domain, which have involved many disciplines. However, with the development of social economy, new situations and new problems have emerged. The lack of morality in the public sphere has not been fundamentally resolved. This article mainly through the literature research method, materialist dialectics, observation law to the public domain moral deficiency present situation carries on the elaboration and the analysis, finally attempts from the consummation social public life domain ethics, establishes the public power abuse restriction mechanism. Improve the market ethics and other three aspects to find a solution to the lack of moral countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】:西安外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D648
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 任晓林,谢斌;政府自利性的逻辑悖论[J];国家行政学院学报;2003年06期
2 晏辉;论社会转型的实质、困境与出路[J];内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版);1998年01期
3 齐明山;转变观念 界定关系──关于中国政府机构改革的几点思考[J];新视野;1999年01期
4 马晓明;袁敬伟;;公共权力监督与制衡的思考[J];行政与法;2007年01期
5 涂晓芳;;政府利益对政府行为的影响[J];中国行政管理;2002年10期
本文编号:1645845
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/sizhenglunwen/1645845.html