当前影响学术期刊质量提升的因素及其消除

发布时间：2018-01-18 08:10

本文关键词：当前影响学术期刊质量提升的因素及其消除　出处：《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在现有环境下,学术期刊质量的优劣和高下,主观上取决于期刊在以下几个方面如何作为与取舍:把期刊作为牟利的工具,还是繁荣学术的园地;是跟着学术期刊评价体系的后面走,丧失自我,还是坚持以学术为本位的办刊方针,走自主办刊之路;是以行政主管部门的评价体系为办刊标准,"唯上办刊",还是尊重办刊规律,以广大读者作者的学术诉求为办刊标准。读者作者的评价是检验学术期刊质量的最终标准,这是谁也无法更动的办刊规律。期刊评价的最终标准,也是最为客观的标准,掌握在广大读者作者手中。欲提升学术期刊的质量,彰显学术期刊风格,学术期刊界在办刊方针和宗旨上必须拨乱反正,形成共识,尊重办刊规律,把广大读者作者的学术诉求作为办刊的首要甚至是唯一标准。惟如此,方能求得学术期刊繁荣学术事业的本初目的。
[Abstract]:In the present environment, the quality of academic journals depends on how to choose and choose the journals in the following aspects: to use journals as a tool for profit, or to flourish the academic garden; Should we follow the evaluation system of academic journals and lose ourselves, or should we stick to the policy of running journals based on learning, and take the road of running periodicals on our own; Should the evaluation system of the administrative department be regarded as the standard of running a magazine, "only running a magazine on the top", or respecting the law of running a publication. The author's evaluation is the ultimate standard to test the quality of academic journals, which can not be changed by anyone. In order to improve the quality of academic journals and highlight the style of academic journals, the academic journals must correct the confusion and form a consensus on the principles and purposes of running journals. By respecting the rule of running journals and taking the academic demands of readers as the primary or even the only criterion for the publication, we can achieve the primary aim of flourishing academic undertakings of academic journals.
【作者单位】：山东大学《文史哲》编辑部;
【分类号】：G237.5
【正文快照】： 当前,学术期刊的影响力,主要取决于如下四个方面:学术期刊质量,学术期刊特色,学术期刊传播手段和学术期刊评价体系。粗看起来,质量、特色、传播手段、评价体系四个方面,对期刊的学术影响力,都发挥着或大或小的作用。但细细思量,四者之中,传播手段与评价体系对期刊本身来说,属

【参考文献】