文学研究的创新仍应以文献及其解读为基

发布时间：2018-01-10 14:27

  本文关键词：文学研究的创新仍应以文献及其解读为基础——以李白与科举相关问题为例的分析　出处：《文学评论》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 李白 科举 诗赋 开元二十三年 漏于属籍

【摘要】：李白与科举的关系众说纷纭,可归纳为两类,即性格说和身份说。本文将其划分为三个时期论述,青少年时期为科举准备阶段,诗歌写作对仗工整,有绮丽倾向,而投刺和献诗,可视为准备过程中的行为。安陆十年,并没有放弃科举的努力,开元二十三年送人赴举诗,实际上是李白自己的写照,也是对自己的反思。其后,李白移家山东,走上另一条非科举而入仕之路,以供奉翰林为归结。李白放弃科举的原因非性格所致,也不是曾为小吏或商人家庭,而是"漏于属籍"。
[Abstract]:The relationship between Li Bai and Public opinions are divergent. examination, can be divided into two categories, namely, character and identity. This paper will be divided into three periods of adolescence, preparation for the imperial examination, writing poetry antithesis neat, beautiful and has a tendency to retire from public life and poetry, can be regarded as a behavior. In the process of preparing Anlu for ten years, and no give up the imperial efforts, Kaiyuan twenty-three years to give up poetry, is actually his portrayal of Li Bai, but also for their own reflection. Later, Li Bai moved to Shandong, embarked on another imperial examination in non Road, to worship is attributed. Li Bai gave up the imperial examination of non character caused, not once for the beadle or merchant family, but "leakage from the membership.

【作者单位】： 华南师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：I206.2
【正文快照】： 李白与科举关系研究大致可归纳为两类:其一是性格论;其二是身份论。性格论者以逻辑推理方法,印证主观判断,即李白性格豪放,不拘常规,不屑于科举(1)。而身份论者以文献资料为基础,从李白身份出发,找出李白不能参加科举考试的客观条件(2)。双方对于李白为何没有参加科举的解释差，

本文编号：1405627