唐宋派《史记》接受研究

发布时间：2018-01-11 02:08

本文关键词：唐宋派《史记》接受研究　出处：《西南大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：明代中期文学复古思潮高涨,复古革新成为这一时期的时代精神,涌现出了文学复古流派。以王慎中、唐顺之、茅坤、归有光为代表的散文家因师法唐宋文而被称为唐宋派,与由前后七子组成的秦汉派相互对立。唐宋派是一个以宗法唐宋文为主的散文流派,《史记》则是秦汉文的典范,是主张复古的秦汉派的斗争武器,在明中期复古的背景下二者由此而产生联系。唐宋派对《史记》推崇备至,不仅于散文中多次论及,且都对《史记》进行了评点或选录,他们师法唐宋文,其实是欲借唐宋文之门径入秦汉文堂奥,进而以窥六经之旨,上溯古文之道。从明代中后期文学与文化的整体视野上看,唐宋派与秦汉派皆推崇《史记》,都肯定《史记》的文学价值,重视《史记》的审美艺术,体现出二者在复古上的殊途同归。而从取法内容看,秦汉派专学《史记》句法、章法,模拟其文辞,唐宋派则透过文字渗透到《史记》的内在神理,由此发掘出“史迁风神”,比之秦汉派更加深入。与此同时,唐宋派的流派性质和《史记》的文学性质也决定了该派接受《史记》的独特性质,即他们对《史记》的接受是理学性质的作家对情感主义文学的接受,是经过文学思想过滤和改造之后的主动接受,这与秦汉派的被动接受有所区别。唐宋派超越浅层面的文辞句法,以“风神”论《史记》,着力发掘《史记》作为传记文学的叙事艺术,探寻唐宋文与《史记》一脉相承的风神精神,由此开辟出一条从唐宋文上溯秦汉文的复古路径,也为后来的复古开辟了新的方向。他们的接受既是对《史记》文本的解读,又反过来影响了该派的散文创作,使他们在散文创作中借鉴史记精神,学习史记笔法,在追求风神的同时兼重文章的情感表达,从而形成了具有流派特色的审美规范,而他们的散文也因生动自然、情感真挚而辉耀于明代文坛。
[Abstract]:In the middle of the Ming Dynasty, the trend of thought of restoring the ancient times was high, and the reform of the ancient literature became the spirit of the times of this period, resulting in the emergence of literary retro schools. Wang Shenzhong, Tang Shunzhi, Mao Kun. The essayist represented by Gui Youguang is called Tang and Song school because of his teaching style, which is opposite to the Qin Han school which is composed of seven sons. The Tang and Song Dynasty school is a prose school mainly composed of patriarchal style and Tang and Song languages. The Historical Records is the model of Qin and Han languages and the struggle weapon of the Qin and Han schools who advocated the restoration of ancient times. Under the background of the restoration of the ancient times in the middle of Ming Dynasty, the two were related. Not only in prose, but also in the history of the commentary or selection, they learn from the Tang and Song languages, in fact, they want to use the path of the Tang and Song languages into the Qin and Han dynasties, and then to see the purpose of the six Classics. From the view of literature and culture in the middle and late Ming Dynasty, both Tang and Song dynasties and Qin and Han dynasties respected the Historical Records, affirmed the literary value of the Historical Records, and attached importance to the aesthetic art of the Historical Records. From the point of view of the content of the method, Qin and Han schools studied the syntax, composition and imitation of its writings, while the Tang and Song schools infiltrated the inner deities of the Records of the History through the characters. At the same time, the genre nature of Tang and Song dynasties and the literary nature of the Book of History also decided the unique nature of the school to accept the Book of History. That is, their acceptance of the Book of History is the acceptance of sentimental literature by the writers of Neo-Confucianism and the active acceptance after the literary thought has been filtered and reformed. This is different from the passive acceptance of the Qin and Han schools. The Tang and Song schools transcended the superficial lexical syntax and took "Wind Spirit" on the Book of History as the narrative art of biographical literature. In order to explore the spirit of the wind and spirit in the Tang and Song dynasties and the Records of the History, we can find a way to go back to the Qin and Han languages from the Tang and Song dynasties. Their acceptance is not only the interpretation of the text of the Historical Records, but also the influence of the prose creation of this school, so that they can learn from the spirit of the Historical Records in the prose creation. The study of Shi Ji's style of writing, while pursuing the spirit of the wind and emphasizing the emotional expression of the article, formed the aesthetic norms with the characteristics of the genre, and their prose was also vivid and natural, sincere in emotion and shining in the literary world of the Ming Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I206.2

【参考文献】