鸳鸯蝴蝶派:新文学建构中的他者——“京海之争”的一个补注

发布时间：2018-02-28 01:17

本文关键词： 鸳鸯蝴蝶派 “海派” 沈从文 “京海之争”　出处：《求索》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：20世纪30年代初,沈从文提出了新旧海派的概念,虽然京海之争一致确认了鸳鸯蝴蝶派的旧海派身份,而对于新海派却意见不一。鸳鸯蝴蝶派作为旧文学的代表,引发了20世纪20年代初的新旧文学之争,对它的批判则构成了新文学自我建设的逻辑起点;而在20年代末至30年代初新文学内部的急剧分化中,沈从文为批判当时文坛严重的“左倾”现象,以“海派”这一模糊的概念将鸳鸯蝴蝶派和部分左翼作家联系在一起,从而对后者主张文艺依附于政治的创作态度展开尖锐的批评。这两场论战之间存在着一种微妙的断续,而沈从文对“海派”的阐释则进一步确认了鸳鸯蝴蝶派在整个新文学建构过程中的“他者”地位。
[Abstract]:In early 1930s, Shen Congwen put forward the new concept of Beijing Shanghai, although the Sea dispute confirmed the Yuanyanghudie School of the old Shanghai identity, and for the Xinhai who disagree. Yuanyanghudie school as a representative of the old literature, triggered a new literary struggle at the beginning of 1920s, it is a criticism of the logical starting point of the new literature self construction; and at the end of 20s to early 30s new sharp differentiation within the literature, literary criticism of Shen Congwen is serious "left" phenomenon, the "Shanghai" fuzzy concepts will Yuanyanghudie school and some left-wing writers together, so as to advocate the latter depended on the political attitude launched a sharp criticism. There is a subtle discontinuous between these two controversies, and Shen Congwen of "Shanghai" interpretation is further confirmed in the new paper Yuanyanghudie school The "other" status in the process of learning.

【作者单位】：清华大学中文系;

【相似文献】