《史记》“寓论断于序事”探索

发布时间：2018-03-09 06:53

本文选题：对话　切入点：叙述　出处：《上海师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“寓论断于序事”作为《史记》创作的重要手法自顾炎武提出至今已有三百多年,它不仅是司马迁为使《史记》区别于一般史书由编者直抒观点强加给读者的艺术选择,更是司马迁在叙述当代史时的必然选择。但是一直以来学术界对《史记》“寓论断于序事”的重视程度与这一重要艺术手法在《史记》中的地位与作用远不相符,并且对其概念的理解时有混淆。本文将在前人研究的基础上对《史记》“寓论断于序事”进行更加详细的分类和辨析,在对话、叙述、对比三种基本表现方式下进行详细的分类论述,力求做到能够明晰这一手法的具体表现形式。此外,还将其和“春秋笔法”、《左传》进行辨析,以明确其内涵和独创性,从而证明“寓论断于序事”在《史记》中的重要性以及对其进行研究的现实意义。
[Abstract]:It has been more than 300 years since Gu Yanwu put forward "putting judgment in Preface", which is not only the artistic choice that Si Maqian imposed on readers in order to distinguish "Historical Records" from the general history books, which were imposed on readers by the writers' viewpoint of expressing their views directly. It is also an inevitable choice for Si Maqian in narrating the contemporary history. However, the importance attached by the academic circles to "putting judgment in the preface" is far from consistent with the position and function of this important art technique in the "Records of the historian". On the basis of the previous studies, this paper will classify and discriminate in more detail the book of Records of the historian, which is composed of two parts: in the dialogue, in the narration, in the dialogue, and in the narration. In order to make clear the concrete form of expression of this technique, the detailed classification and discussion under the three basic ways of expression are compared. In addition, it is distinguished from the "Chunqiu method" and "Zuo Zhuan" in order to clarify its connotation and originality. Thus, it proves the importance of "putting judgment in preface" in Records of History and the practical significance of studying it.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I207.5

【参考文献】