周作人论鲁迅“山灵的讽刺”

发布时间：2018-04-04 13:56

  本文选题：灵的讽刺　切入点：周作人　出处：《北京社会科学》2017年12期

【摘要】：从周作人评价鲁迅《阿Q正传》所用"山灵的讽刺"这一概念入手,探讨其根源,指出周作人在定义鲁迅的写作特质时,除根据他们共同的阅读范围来确定鲁迅所受影响的来源外,主要依据了自己所受的古希腊及英国文学的影响。所谓"山灵的"(Satyric)这一限定语,既包含古希腊神话人物萨提儿本身的特质,又包含古希腊特有剧种萨提儿剧的特征。周作人还挪用了泰纳《英国文学史》中对斯威夫特的评述,作为其定义鲁迅"山灵的讽刺"手法的重要参照。正因为周氏兄弟思想资源的差异,周作人对鲁迅写作技法的理解中实暗含着两处与鲁迅的分歧:一是对幽默概念的不同认知,二是尼采意义上日神与酒神精神所象征的不同个性与人生选择。
[Abstract]:Starting with Zhou Zuoren's evaluation of the concept of "satire of the mountain spirit" used by Zhou Zuoren, this paper discusses its origin, and points out that Zhou Zuoren, when defining the writing characteristics of Zhou Zuoren,In addition to determining the source of Lu Xun's influence according to their common reading scope, it is mainly based on their own influence of ancient Greek and English literature.The so-called "Shanling's" Satyric, a qualifier, not only contains the characteristics of the ancient Greek mythical character Satil itself, but also contains the characteristics of the ancient Greek drama Satil.Zhou Zuoren also misappropriated the comment on Swift in Tanner's History of English Literature as an important reference for his definition of Sacramento's satire.Because of the difference of the Zhou brothers' ideological resources, Zhou Zuoren's understanding of Lu Xun's writing techniques implies two differences with Lu Xun: one is the different cognition of the concept of humor.Second, Nietzsche's different personality and life choice symbolized by the spirit of the Sun God and the Dionysian Spirit in the sense of Nietzsche.
【作者单位】： 合肥师范学院文学院;
【分类号】：I206.6
，

本文编号：1710244