《聊斋志异》蒲松龄自评与何守奇评之比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-08 15:00

本文选题：聊斋志异　切入点：蒲松龄　出处：《绍兴文理学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文主要就《聊斋志异》蒲松龄自评与何守奇评从思想内容与艺术特点两方面进行比较研究,另外,分析了造成两者评点差异性的主要因素。主要为四个部分:第一部分简要概述蒲松龄自评与何守奇评点。认为自评是所有评点中最能有效实现“通作者之心,开览者之心”的评点形式,并指出蒲松龄自评与《聊斋志异》故事之母体不同,《聊斋故事》的故事母体大多有现实依据,而抒发“孤愤”则主要体现在其自评上;还简要介绍了“异史氏曰”的继承与由来。另外,简要说明因何评在数量上多、刊刻时间最早、对《聊斋志异》的传播有重要价值,故而值得研究。第二部分就蒲松龄自评与何守奇评的思想内容作比较,突出自评之关注现世,何评之关注怪异;自评内容之丰赡,何评内容之单薄。第三部分就蒲松龄自评与何守奇评的艺术特点作比较,主要从讽刺艺术、语言艺术、文体艺术将二者之评点进行对比。认为蒲氏自评讽刺手段多样,在讽刺之中又往往融入自己的切肤之痛;何守奇评点则注重道德的感悟、说教。文体上,蒲氏自评文体多样,何守奇则爱警语。两者的评点语言都简洁,但蒲氏自评简而能深,直指要害,何守奇评简明扼要,化繁为简,可谓同中有异。第四部分从立场、才力、观念、动机四个方面分析造成二者差异性的原因。
[Abstract]:This paper makes a comparative study on Pu Songling's self-evaluation and he Shouqi's comments from the aspects of ideological content and artistic characteristics. In addition, it analyzes the main factors that cause the difference between the two comments.Mainly for four parts: the first part of a brief overview of Pu Songling self-evaluation and he Shouqi comments.The author thinks that self-evaluation is the most effective way to realize "the heart of the author, the mind of the reader", and points out that Pu Songling's self-evaluation is different from the mother of the story of "Liaozhai Story", and that most of the stories of "Liaozhai Story" have realistic basis.The expression of "solitary indignation" is mainly reflected in its self-evaluation, but also briefly introduced the inheritance and origin of "Yi Shi Yue".In addition, a brief explanation of why there are more comments in quantity and the earliest time of publication is of great value to the spread of Liaozhai, so it is worth studying.The third part compares the artistic characteristics of Pu Songling's self-evaluation and he Shouqi's criticism, mainly from satire art, language art and stylistic art.The author thinks that Pope's self-criticism and satire means are various, and he Shouqi's comments pay attention to moral perception and preach in the process of satire.Stylistically, Pope's self-criticism of various styles, he Shouqi is a love of warning.Both comments are concise, but Pope's self-criticism can be deep and direct to the key, he Shouqi's comment is concise and complex, it can be said that there are similarities and differences.The fourth part analyzes the reasons of their differences from four aspects of standpoint, talent, concept and motivation.
【学位授予单位】：绍兴文理学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.419

【参考文献】