当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 中国文学论文 >

竹内好鲁迅研究批判

发布时间:2018-04-10 08:43

  本文选题:竹内好 切入点:《鲁迅》 出处:《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2017年04期


【摘要】:以太平洋战争的爆发为契机,日本学者竹内好释放了对侵华战争的负疚感,并通过解散中国研究会、废刊《中国文学》等行为,表达自己对"大东亚战争"的拥护。在"二战"进入白热化阶段、日本陷入绝境的现状下,竹内好将鲁迅塑造为一个回心于"无"的绝对文学者,以此来否定"哲学的结构"的西洋近代文化,建构"文学的结构"的"大东亚文化"。战后,竹内好则从作为"大东亚战争"之"意识形态翼赞"的"近代的超克"论述里,发明了反近代主义的"作为方法的亚洲"。追求东亚主体性的反近代主义的近代,既是竹内好之始终未变的思想轴心,也是其根本悖论之所在,并形成了一种反人道的文学主义的法西斯倾向。实际上,文学主义的法西斯不仅是竹内好个人的特点,而且是20世纪以来的各种激进主义的反近代性思想及其历史实践的普遍性特征,这使今日世界依然游荡着法西斯的幽灵。竹内好生发于"二战"时期的文学思想、政治思考和鲁迅研究,似乎印证了本雅明对法西斯美学的政治批判:近代社会中的"人类的异化已达到这样的程度,以至于它能把自身的毁灭当作放在首位的审美快感来体验。这便是法西斯求助于美学的政治形势"。
[Abstract]:Taking the outbreak of the Pacific War as an opportunity, Japanese scholar Takeshi Takeshi released his guilt about the war of aggression against China, and expressed his support for the "Great East Asia War" by disbanding the China Research Society and abolishing the publication "Chinese Literature".In the stage of "World War II" entering a white-hot stage and Japan in a desperate situation, Takeshi portrays Lu Xun as an absolute literary man with "nothing" in mind, thus negating the "structure of philosophy" of modern Western culture.The construction of the structure of literature and the culture of East Asia.After the war, Takeshi invented the anti-modern "Asia as a method" from the "ideology praise" of the "Great East Asia War".The modern anti-modernism pursuing the subjectivity of East Asia is not only the same ideological axis but also the fundamental paradox, and forms a kind of fascist tendency of anti-humanity literary doctrine.In fact, the fascism of literary doctrine is not only the characteristic of the individual, but also the universal feature of various radical anti-modern thoughts and historical practice since the 20th century, which makes the world still loiter with the spectre of fascism.The literary thought, political thinking and the study of Lu Xun, which originated in the period of World War II, seem to confirm Benjamin's political criticism of fascist aesthetics: "the alienation of mankind has reached such a degree in modern society,"So that it can experience its own destruction as an aesthetic pleasure in the first place.This is the political situation in which fascists turn to aesthetics. "
【作者单位】: 青岛大学文学院;
【基金】:作者主持研究的国家社科基金后期资助项目“作为方法的日本鲁迅研究:从竹内好到伊藤虎丸(16FZW034)”的阶段性成果
【分类号】:I210;I313.064

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 薛毅;;现代价值与东方理想——读竹内好的《近代的超克》[J];中文自学指导;2005年06期

2 张景兰;;“幻灯事件”与“找茬事件”——竹内好的别样解读[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2006年06期

3 秦梨丽;;保田与重郎与竹内好的中国认识之比较——以“现代的超克”理论为中心[J];长江大学学报(社会科学版);2011年06期

4 罗岗;;“文学”与“大东亚战争” 也谈“竹内好悖论”[J];读书;2006年07期

5 董贵山;;近现代中日文学关系中的鲁迅与竹内好研究[J];剑南文学(经典教苑);2013年08期

6 靳丛林;李明晖;;竹内好:凭藉鲁迅的文化反思[J];文学评论;2011年05期

7 孙歌;极限状态下的政治感觉[J];开放时代;2004年01期



本文编号:1730497

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/1730497.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6f73f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com