秦观散文文学性研究

发布时间：2018-04-29 07:05

本文选题：秦观 + 散文　；参考：《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文主要通过史料的整理钩辑,对秦观散文的文学性做了较为合理的阐述,同时也对秦观散文在文学史上的地位进行了简单的探讨。秦观身处文化繁荣、政治开明的宋朝,他的出生、仕途、阅历、交友等影响了他的思想,使他的思想复杂纷繁。这些思想让他能够在得意时更加进取,在失意时能迅速调整心态,同时这些思想作用于他的文学创作中,也使得他的文学作品内容丰富、思想深刻。历代对于秦观散文的态度和研究大概是这样一种状况：北宋时期,秦观散文是深受人们的喜爱和赞赏的；南宋时期,更是大量刊刻其文,认为秦观散文能够自成一家；到了元朝,他的文章逐渐被词作所掩盖,人们往往只关注他的词而忽视了他的文章；明朝时期,茅坤的《唐宋八大家文钞》的出现,使得人们对于唐宋散文的认识仅停留在“韩、柳、欧、苏、王、曾”的身上,提及唐宋散文就是韩、柳、欧、苏,连对王安石、曾巩、苏洵、苏辙的关注也不够,秦观的散文就更不必说了。特别是袁宏道评秦文时说：“文字亦爽健,未免酸腐”。他认为秦文虽然在文字方面比较爽朗矫健,但是内容上却过于酸腐,有浓烈的书生气,不值一读。作为当时的文坛领袖,这种说法完全是对秦观散文的一种误解,使得当时文人也轻视秦文,这不免使人遗憾。建国以后的文学史,对于秦观散文也较少提及,这对读者和研究者来说都是一种损失。好在徐培均和周易敢两位老先生对于秦文都非常重视,他们毕其一生都在致力于秦观散文的研究。徐培均先生编撰的《秦少游年谱长编》、《淮海集笺注》,周易敢先生编撰的《秦观集编年校注》、《秦观资料汇编》为研究者们提供了丰富资料的同时,也使得人们对于秦观散文开始重视起来。其实,秦观的散文虽然是“袭汉唐遗风”,师法东坡,但是在文学艺术性上还是具有独到之处的。他的文章“结构严谨、章法井然、文采绚烂、说理深刻、铺陈排比、气势恢宏、比喻生动、形象丰满、引经据典、说理透辟”,不失为优秀的散文。
[Abstract]:This article mainly through the historical data collation hook collection, has made the more reasonable elaboration to Qin Guan prose literariness, also has carried on the simple discussion to the Qin Guan prose in the literary history position. Qin Guan was in the prosperous and politically enlightened Song Dynasty. His birth, career, experience and making friends influenced his thoughts and complicated his thoughts. These thoughts enable him to be more enterprising when he is pleased and to adjust his mind quickly when he is frustrated. At the same time, these thoughts act on his literary creation and make his literary works rich in content and profound in thought. The attitude and research of Qin Guan prose in the past dynasties are as follows: during the Northern Song Dynasty, Qin Guan prose was deeply loved and appreciated by people; By the Yuan Dynasty, his writings were gradually covered up by ci, and people tended to focus on his words but ignored his articles. In the Ming Dynasty, Mao Kun's "eight Family Notes of Tang and Song dynasties" appeared. So that people's understanding of the prose of Tang and Song Dynasty only stays on the body of "Han, Liu, ou, Su, Wang, Zeng". It is mentioned that the prose of Tang and Song dynasties is Han, Liu, ou, Su. Even the attention to Wang Anshi, Zeng Gong, Su Xun and Su Zhi is not enough. Qin Guan's prose, let alone say. Yuan Hongdao, in particular, commented on Qin Wen: "the text is also refreshing, sour rot." He believed that Qin Wen, although relatively lively in the text, but the content is too sour, strong bookish, not worth reading. As a literary leader at that time, it was a misunderstanding of Qin Guan's prose, which made the literati despise Qin Wen, which was regrettable. The history of literature after the founding of the people's Republic of China was seldom mentioned in Qin Guan's prose, which was a loss to readers and researchers. Fortunately, Xu Peijun and Zhou Yi-dang both attached great importance to Qin Wen. They devoted their whole life to the study of Qin Guan's prose. Mr. Xu Peijun compiled "Qin Shaoyou chronological Chronicle", "Huaihai Collection Notes", "Zhou Yi Gan" Qin Guan Collection "," Qin Guan data compilation "provided researchers with abundant information at the same time. It also makes people begin to attach importance to Qin Guan prose. In fact, although Qin Guan's prose is a "legacy of Han and Tang dynasties", it is unique in literature and art. His article, "rigorous structure, well-organized, brilliant literary, profound reasoning, pretensions, grandeur, vivid metaphor, full image, citing classics, reasoning thoroughly", can be regarded as excellent prose.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I207.62

【参考文献】