困境中的坚守:戴钧衡传承桐城文派的文化考察
本文选题:戴钧衡 + 文化坚守 ; 参考:《安徽师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:桐城派作为一个散文流派,能在林林总总的文学流派中脱颖而出,传衍不衰,绵延长达两百年,主盟清代文坛,成为当时最大的散文流派,这主要基于桐城派门人秉承文派宗旨,发展桐城古文,不断提高文章与文论水准等为门派传承所作出的不懈努力。十九世纪上半叶,时局动荡不安、战乱频繁,而此时桐城派文坛盟主的地位已然有所撼动,桐城派文人如何振兴门派,挽狂澜于既倒,扶大厦之将倾,成为他们尤为关注与思考的。本文将以桐城派文人戴钧衡为研究主体,截取其文化活动中的重要节点,试图阐释其对文化的坚守与传承行为。文章分为四个部分。第一章主要介绍戴钧衡所处的时代背景,分析桐城派在传承过程中的困境。第二章重点介绍了方东树与戴钧衡之间的师生关系。第一部分从主客观视角出发,分析戴钧衡拜方东树为师的原因;第二部分则以戴钧衡拜方东树为师为界,通过比较戴钧衡前后期诗歌集在诗歌类型、风格、手法上的差异性,着重表现其师方东树诗学专著《昭昧詹言》对戴钧衡诗歌创作的影响,进一步探寻出其在现实环境之下所做出的调整与适变。第三章主要从整理乡邦文集入手,以戴名世为典型事例。这主要基于戴名世本人的争议性,桐城派文人因“南山集案”对戴名世忌惮不已,而戴钧衡竭尽所能整理其文集,这样的行为无疑带有一定的深层意味。后又将戴名世与戴钧衡的古文特色进行评点,归纳出戴钧衡古文的艺术特色。第四章以戴钧衡与桐乡书院为研究对象。本章先是对桐乡书院的创办过程进行概述,其次主要论述戴钧衡创办桐乡书院的原因,再次通过考证其为书院建设所制定的具体举措,从而探究教育之于文化传承的深刻意义。结语部分是对戴钧衡拜师访学、整理乡邦文集、兴学讲学等文化活动的小结,明晰时代低潮之下的文人心态,阐释文化活动的内在关联,突显其现实意义,从而升华主题,引出对传统文化的思考,点明传统文化与现实社会两者之间存在的矛盾,进而探究文人为实现文化的传承在社会的大背景之下,如何能体现个人的价值,完成文化与社会的交融和对接。
[Abstract]:As a school of prose, the Tongcheng school is able to stand out in the general literary genres of Lin and Lin, and spread and evolve for up to two hundred years. The literary circle of the Qing Dynasty in the Qing Dynasty has become the largest school of prose at that time. This is mainly based on the development of the literary tenet, the development of the ancient prose of Tongcheng, and the continuous improvement of the article and the level of literary theory for the inheritance of the school. Unremitting efforts in the first half of the nineteenth Century, the current situation was turbulent and the war was frequent. At this time, the status of the Tongcheng School of liberal arts allies had been shaken, and how the Tongcheng scholars were able to rejuvenate the factions, to save the mountains and to help the edifice of the mansion, to be particularly concerned and thinking. This article will take the Tongcheng school scholar Dai Junheng as the research subject and intercept it. The important node in cultural activities tries to explain its adherence to culture and its inheritance. The article is divided into four parts. The first chapter mainly introduces the background of Dai Junheng's times and analyzes the plight of the Tongcheng school in the process of inheritance. The second chapter focuses on the relationship between the teacher and the students between Fang Dongshu and Dai Junheng. The first part is from the perspective of subjective and objective views. On the basis of the analysis of the reason for Dai Jun Heng to worship the East tree as a teacher, the second part, taking Dai Jun Heng's East tree as the division, compares the poetic types, styles and techniques of the poems of Jun Heng in the earlier period, and emphasizes the influence of his master Fang Dongshu poetic monograph on the creation of Dai Junheng's poetry. In the third chapter, the third chapter is mainly based on the collation of the village state anthology, which is based on Dai Mingshi as a typical example. This is mainly based on the controversial nature of Dai Mingshi. The Tongcheng pat literati are unscruple about Dai Ming in the case of "the case of Nanshan collection". Deep meaning. Then, then the characteristics of Dai Mingshi and Dai Junheng's ancient prose are evaluated, and the artistic features of Dai Jun Heng are summed up. The fourth chapter takes Dai Jun Heng and Tongxiang academy as the research object. This chapter first summarizes the establishment process of Tongxiang academy, secondly mainly discusses the reasons of Dai Junheng's establishment of Tongxiang academy, and again through textual research The conclusion is to explore the profound significance of education for cultural heritage. The concluding part is a summary of the cultural activities such as Dai Jun's visits, the collation of the rural state anthology, the learning of learning and other cultural activities, the clarity of the literati's mentality under the low tide of the times, the interpretation of the intrinsic relevance of cultural activities, and the significance of the cultural activities, thus the sublimation of the theme. It leads to the reflection on the traditional culture and points out the contradiction between the traditional culture and the real society, and then explores how the literati can reflect the individual value and complete the integration and docking of culture and society in order to realize the cultural heritage in the great background of the society.
【学位授予单位】:安徽师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I206.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘德州;;戴钧衡之学术渊源及其《书传补商》之特色[J];孔子研究;2015年06期
2 郭青林;;方东树“诗文一理”说与其诗歌体用论[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2014年06期
3 李杨武;;浅读《皖桐香山戴氏宗谱》[J];广东技术师范学院学报;2014年01期
4 张晓婧;;清代桐城桐乡书院的管理特色[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2013年03期
5 石珂;;桐城末学的群体构成与唐宋古文接受[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年06期
6 石雷;;明清诗文研究的观念、方法和格局漫谈[J];文学遗产;2011年03期
7 杨怀志;;曾国藩与桐城文人[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
8 胡建次;;清代诗学理论批评视野中的诗气论[J];北方论丛;2009年02期
9 曾光光;;戴名世与桐城派关系辨析[J];安徽史学;2008年05期
10 刘丽娟;周君闲;;桐城派教育心理学思想初探[J];当代教育论坛(学科教育研究);2007年07期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 王启芳;晚清桐城诗派研究[D];山东大学;2014年
2 张晓婧;清代安徽书院研究[D];安徽师范大学;2014年
3 陈春华;清代书院与桐城文派的传衍[D];苏州大学;2013年
4 陈晓红;方东树诗学研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 王元冬;清代前期文化政策研究[D];青岛大学;2013年
2 占文倩;明清桐城地方宗族的祖先记忆与族谱编纂[D];江西师范大学;2013年
3 佟欣;论戴名世的古文理论及创作[D];齐齐哈尔大学;2013年
4 田丰;方东树的学术与古文创作[D];苏州大学;2011年
5 司雯;戴钧衡:桐城派盛衰之际的现实文人[D];安徽大学;2010年
6 王艳辉;曾国藩与道咸同年间传统文化的嬗变[D];辽宁师范大学;2005年
,本文编号:1860382
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/1860382.html