当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 中国文学论文 >

徐光启《毛诗六帖讲意》的文学阐释研究

发布时间:2018-10-15 08:42
【摘要】:徐光启的《毛诗六帖讲意》,综合汉宋之长,融经学阐释和文学阐释予一炉,是明代研究《诗经》的一部重要著作。徐光启在经学的立场下,对《诗经》作了大量的文学探讨,颇能体现中晚明以文学解《诗》的特色,为《诗经》研究从经学走向文学的道路做出了贡献。徐光启《毛诗六帖讲意》对《诗经》的文学阐释主要包括以下几个方面:第一,徐光启注重涵咏玩味的解诗方法,主张解《诗》时以意逆志,他大量吸收前人成果的同时却不拘泥。他提倡立足文本,注重以文学手法解《诗》,强调解《诗》应该圆融活脱,在解《诗》中渗透了温柔敦厚的诗教观。他的阐释融合了经学和文学,可见他对《诗经》的经学定位和文学解构。第二,对《诗经》字句章法的品评是徐光启文学阐释的重要方面。徐光启在字句解读中揭示了诗歌的情感内蕴,对诗歌的篇章结构有不少精彩的分析,对诗句的表现力给予了充分地关注。徐光启关注《诗经》具体诗篇的外在形式,注重从诗歌角度来解读《诗经》。他体认诗人语气、以音韵论诗体,从题材、体裁、风格的角度论风、雅、颂。值得关注的是,徐光启从形象批评和以画论《诗》的品评方式对《诗经》的审美特征作了解析。第三,《毛诗六帖讲意》中涉及了《诗经》的多种修辞技法,包括比兴、婉曲、模写、互文、错综、重叠、层递、警策等,体现了徐光启的修辞观和他在《诗经》解读中对诗歌表达技巧的重视,从诗艺角度论《诗》的特色。第四,徐光启从诗史的角度出发,对《诗经》的艺术范型多有关注。徐光启在《毛诗六帖讲意》中多次论及《诗经》的艺术源头作用,指出后世文学作品对《诗经》的祖述。在具体《诗篇》的解读中,他引后世同类诗歌对《诗经》进行阐释,以诗论《诗》。徐光启揭示了《诗经》为后世文学作品所不及的艺术高峰地位,肯定了《诗经》高超的艺术技巧。徐光启的解《诗》方式体现了鲜明的文学特色,他的《诗经》解读对后代以文学解《诗》的学者,如贺贻孙、姚际恒、王夫之、方玉润等人都产生了较大的影响,为后世《诗经》的文学阐释提供了蓝本,推动了《诗经》文学阐释的发展。
[Abstract]:Xu Guangqi's "six posts of Mao Shi", which synthesizes the strengths of Han and Song dynasties, combines the interpretation of the Confucian Classics and the interpretation of literature into a furnace, which is an important work in the study of the Book of songs in the Ming Dynasty. Xu Guangqi made a great deal of literary discussion on the Book of songs from the standpoint of Confucian Classics, which can reflect the characteristics of literary interpretation of poetry in the middle and late Ming Dynasty, and has contributed to the study of the Book of songs from the study of classics to literature. Xu Guangqi's literary interpretation of the Book of songs mainly includes the following aspects: first, Xu Guangqi pays attention to the method of resolving poems with playful notes, and advocates that the interpretation of poetry should be carried out with the intention of opposing the will when it comes to the interpretation of the Book of songs. He absorbed the achievements of his predecessors in large quantities, but at the same time he was not rigid. He advocated based on the text, paid attention to the interpretation of poetry by literary techniques, stressed that the interpretation of poetry should be mellow and free, and permeated the gentle and honest view of poetry education in the interpretation of poetry. His interpretation combines the study of classics and literature, so it can be seen that his study of the Book of songs and literary deconstruction. Second, the comment on the composition of the Book of songs is an important aspect of Xu Guangqi's literary interpretation. Xu Guangqi reveals the emotional connotation of poetry in the interpretation of words and sentences, has a lot of wonderful analysis of the structure of the poem, and pays full attention to the expressive force of the poem. Xu Guangqi pays attention to the external form of the specific poems in the Book of songs and interprets the Book of songs from the perspective of poetry. He recognises the poet's tone, discusses the poetic style by rhyme, and discusses the wind, elegance and song from the perspective of subject matter, genre and style. What is worth paying attention to is that Xu Guangqi analyzes the aesthetic characteristics of the Book of songs from the perspective of image criticism and the evaluation of the Book of songs. Third, in the Book of songs, there are a variety of rhetorical techniques involved in the Book of songs, including the following: "Bixing", "euphemism", "Moulding", "intertextuality", "intricate", "overlapping", "layers of delivery", "warning measures", and so on. It embodies Xu Guangqi's rhetoric view and his emphasis on poetry expression skills in the interpretation of the Book of songs, and discusses the characteristics of poetry from the perspective of poetic art. Fourth, Xu Guangqi, from the perspective of the history of poetry, pay more attention to the artistic paradigm of the Book of songs. Xu Guangqi has discussed the function of the art source of the Book of songs many times in the six posts of Mao's Poems, and pointed out the ancestral narration of the Book of songs in later literary works. In the interpretation of Psalm, he interprets the Book of songs by citing the poetry of the later generations. Xu Guangqi reveals that the Book of songs is not the highest level of art in later literary works, and affirms the superb artistic skills of the Book of songs. Xu Guangqi's interpretation of the Book of songs has exerted a great influence on the scholars such as he Yi-sun, Yao Jiheng, Wang Fuzhi, Fang Yurun, and so on. It provides a blueprint for the literary interpretation of the Book of songs and promotes the development of the literary interpretation of the Book of songs.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:I207.22

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 许霆;“只有分析,才可以得到透彻的了解”——朱自清解诗理论与实践研究之二[J];常熟高专学报;2003年05期

2 许霆;“诗是最多义的,最错综的”——朱自清解诗理论与实践研究之三[J];苏州大学学报;2003年04期

3 张宝石;“解诗”“用诗”摭论[J];学术论坛;2005年06期

4 夏春豪;难解诗的解读途径[J];名作欣赏;2005年15期

5 孙玉石;“对话”:互动形态的阐释与解诗[J];文艺研究;2005年08期

6 张宝石;;“解诗”“用诗”辨[J];文学前沿;2005年01期

7 康泰和;;抛砖引玉试解诗[J];大陆桥视野;2006年04期

8 吴丙辰;;朱自清对中国现代解诗学的贡献[J];大众文艺;2010年12期

9 许霆;;欣赏是在透彻的了解里——朱自清解诗理论与实践研究之一[J];名作欣赏;1996年06期

10 李德辉;解诗二题——兼与艾治平先生商榷[J];学术研究;1998年04期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 王太顺;;辽海讲坛第四讲 解诗学——解读诗歌的理论和方法[A];辽宁省社会科学普及系列丛书4——辽海讲坛·第二辑(文学卷)[C];2008年

2 于淑娟;;《左传》赋诗与《韩诗外传》解诗说[A];《春秋》三传与经学文化[C];2009年

3 胡为雄;;《毛泽东诗词集》中几首诗的注释问题[A];毛泽东诗词研究丛刊(第一辑)[C];2000年

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 止庵;再谈“老妪解诗”[N];中国文化报;2000年

2 本报通讯员 刘玉学;川军雄起罗布泊[N];中国石油报;2003年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 朱唐林;朱自清与中国现代解诗学[D];安徽师范大学;2007年

2 胡钧洋;中学古典诗歌教学中“以诗解诗”教学探究[D];渤海大学;2014年

3 权慧;陈继揆《读风臆补》研究[D];山西大学;2009年

4 王署霞;徐光启《毛诗六帖讲意》的文学阐释研究[D];华东师范大学;2015年



本文编号:2271987

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2271987.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0fc6a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com