生态美学的几点问题

发布时间：2018-03-02 20:28

本文选题：生态美学　切入点：环境　出处：《东岳论丛》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文以探讨生态学在审美价值论证中的运用为例,通过梳理生态美学理论的发展,尤其是对韩裔美籍学者高主锡和中国学者程相占相关理论研究进行观照,可以看出,二者在把生态学与美学联结的过程中,存在一些概念性错误和研究方法的误用。环境的各种价值包括生态价值、伦理价值、审美价值,我们希望这些价值能理想化地互为补充,但同时,我们必须接受它们的差异性,简单地用生态美学或生态伦理学的方式坚持其互补性丝毫不能解决其差异性,没有什么先验必然性确保这些价值和谐共存。没有哪一种价值一定在某一特定的复杂环境问题中占据主导,大多数情况下,它们构成一个规范性复合体,其相对的重要性由当时情况的特殊性质和进行评价的人的判断所决定。更恰当的做法是,为每一种价值在环境体验和认识中所做的重要贡献争取尊重和认可,包括伦理的、科学的/生态的和审美的。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the application of ecology in the demonstration of aesthetic value as an example, through combing the development of ecological aesthetics theory, especially the Korean American scholar Gao Yuxi and the Chinese scholar Cheng Xiangzhan, it can be seen that, In the process of linking ecology and aesthetics, there are some conceptual errors and misuse of research methods. The various values of the environment include ecological value, ethical value, aesthetic value, and we hope that these values can be idealized to complement each other. But at the same time, we must accept their differences, simply using ecological aesthetics or ecological ethics to insist that their complementarities can not solve the differences in the slightest. There is no transcendental necessity to ensure that these values coexist harmoniously. There is no value that must dominate a particular complex environmental problem, and in most cases they constitute a normative complex. Its relative importance is determined by the particular nature of the situation and the judgement of the person conducting the evaluation... more appropriately, it is to gain respect for and recognition of the important contribution that each value makes in environmental experience and understanding, including ethical, Scientific / ecological and aesthetic.
【作者单位】：美国长岛大学;北京第二外国语学院英语学院;
【分类号】：B834

【相似文献】