审美主体与伦理主体的比较研究

发布时间：2018-09-01 09:56

【摘要】：本文通过对审美主体和伦理主体的比较研究揭示了个体存在的伦理层面的含义。首先考察了老庄和海德格尔的后现代宗教式的主体和儒家形而上的宗教主体.以及儒家就伦理问题对于老庄的挑战。结论是他们都缺乏把他者的生存作为自己的绝对的责任的伦理含义,因而是审美主体。其次,通过对于环境主体和伦理主体及审美主体的关系的讨论,阐释了这样一个哲学基本问题:伦理存在必须以有限性存在为前提;而后者只是一个哲学的抽象。片面地强调人的有限性(尼采),片面强调有限存在与超越者的关系(老庄和海德格尔),或否认人的有限性,这些观点都忽略了人在这个世界上的伦理责任。后现代伦理学是指我,作为一个个体(me),对于他者的一切负有不可推卸的
[Abstract]:Through the comparative study of the aesthetic subject and the ethical subject, this paper reveals the meaning of the ethical aspect of the individual existence. First, it examines the post-modern religious subject of Laozhuang and Heidegger and the metaphysical religious subject of Confucianism. As well as the Confucian on the ethical issues of the challenge to Lao Zhuang. The conclusion is that they all lack the ethical meaning of taking the existence of the other as their own absolute responsibility, so they are the aesthetic subject. Secondly, through the discussion of the relationship between the environmental subject, the ethical subject and the aesthetic subject, this paper explains the basic problem of philosophy: the ethical existence must be based on the limited existence, and the latter is only an abstract of philosophy. These views emphasize the limitation of man (Nietzsche), the relationship between finite existence and transcendent (Lao Zhuang and Heidegger), or deny the limitation of man. These views ignore the ethical responsibility of man in this world. Postmodern ethics means that I, as an individual, (me), has an inescapable responsibility for everything of the other.
【作者单位】：武汉大学哲学系
【分类号】：B83

【相似文献】