趣味与情调:梁启超宗白华人生美学情致比较

发布时间：2019-02-14 21:44

【摘要】：梁启超的"趣味"范畴和宗白华的"情调"范畴围绕审美、艺术、人生相统一的核心美学命题,体现了以诗性超越为旨向、远功利而入世的中国式人生美学情致。两个范畴同中有异。它们都主张真善美的统一,主张出世与入世、有为与无为、感性与理性、个体与众生、物质与精神、创造与欣赏、有限与无限等对立面的相洽。但梁启超的"趣味"以"知不可而为"与"为而不有"的统一突出了美善的关联,更倾心于诗性生命的高度提升;宗白华的"情调"则以"至动"与"韵律"的相谐突出了美真的关联,更倾心于诗性生命的深度体认。他们以生命实践及其诗性超越为旨归的人生美学情致,化中西而著民族特色,既共同丰富了中国现代美学精神的画卷与风貌,又彰显了各自的内蕴与个性。
[Abstract]:Liang Qichao's category of "taste" and Zong Baihua's category of "sentiment" revolve around the core aesthetic proposition of the unity of aesthetics, art and life, which embodies the aesthetic sentiment of Chinese life which regards poetic transcendence as its aim and which is far from utilitarian. There are differences between the two categories. They all advocate unity of truth, goodness and beauty, birth and entry into the world, action and inaction, sensibility and reason, individual and sentient beings, material and spiritual, creation and appreciation, finite and infinite. However, Liang Qichao's "taste" with the unity of "knowing but not" and "doing without" highlights the connection of beauty and goodness, and is more devoted to the elevation of poetic life. Zong Baihua's "sentiment" highlights the true connection of beauty and rhythm with the harmony of "Zhi" and "prosody", and is more devoted to the deep understanding of poetic life. They take life practice and their poetic transcendence as the aim of life aesthetics, and turn Chinese and Western into national characteristics, which not only enrich the picture and style of Chinese modern aesthetic spirit, but also reveal their own connotation and individuality.
【作者单位】：浙江理工大学美学与艺术理论中心;浙江理工大学文化传播学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(06BZW013) 浙江省提升地方高校办学水平专项浙江理工大学(XK1115-003-S)
【分类号】：B83

【相似文献】