美何以作为道德的象征——基于语义层面的考察
发布时间：2019-06-04 23:06
【摘要】：康德对于美和道德之间的关系问题所给出的回答是:"美作为道德的象征",或者说"美的东西是道德的善的东西的象征"。在这里,"美"与"道德"分别作为"美的东西"和"道德的善的东西"二者的抽象名词经由"象征"一词实现了关系上的联结。这种关系的成立建构在康德对于二者的区分和类比之上:一方面,美和道德有着异质性的结构,即前者由感性图型上升至理念,而后者则由理念规范感性行动;但另一方面,两者又存在着可类比性,例如,对于美和道德的判断都能使人产生愉悦感,等等。因而,康德以"象征"来描述二者的关系至少在语义层面上是成立的。
[Abstract]:Kant's answer to the question of the relationship between beauty and morality is: "Beauty as a symbol of morality," or "the thing of beauty is the symbol of the good of morality." Here, "beauty" and "morality", as abstract nouns of "beautiful thing" and "moral good thing" respectively, are connected by the word "symbol". The establishment of this relationship is based on Kant's distinction and analogy between the two: on the one hand, beauty and morality have heterogeneous structures, that is, the former rises from perceptual graph to concept, while the latter standardizes perceptual action by idea; On the other hand, there is comparability between the two, such as the judgment of beauty and morality can make people happy, and so on. Therefore, Kant uses symbolism to describe the relationship between the two at least at the semantic level.
【作者单位】： 清华大学人文学院哲学系;
【分类号】：B83-0
，
本文编号：2493067
[Abstract]:Kant's answer to the question of the relationship between beauty and morality is: "Beauty as a symbol of morality," or "the thing of beauty is the symbol of the good of morality." Here, "beauty" and "morality", as abstract nouns of "beautiful thing" and "moral good thing" respectively, are connected by the word "symbol". The establishment of this relationship is based on Kant's distinction and analogy between the two: on the one hand, beauty and morality have heterogeneous structures, that is, the former rises from perceptual graph to concept, while the latter standardizes perceptual action by idea; On the other hand, there is comparability between the two, such as the judgment of beauty and morality can make people happy, and so on. Therefore, Kant uses symbolism to describe the relationship between the two at least at the semantic level.
【作者单位】： 清华大学人文学院哲学系;
【分类号】：B83-0
，
本文编号：2493067
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/meixuelunwen/2493067.html
