论司马光的音乐观与其“中和”思想
发布时间:2018-06-25 00:20
本文选题:乐律 + 北宋 ; 参考:《浙江艺术职业学院学报》2013年04期
【摘要】:北宋时期的司马光是史学巨著《资治通鉴》的编者,而他与范镇之间有关乐律的论争也在历史上留下了不可忽略的一页。司马光与范镇是莫逆之交,但在乐律问题上,他们各持己见,互不相让。于是反复进行讨论诘问,往返书信竟达数万言。而朱熹对此争论的评价颇低,并指出司马光的见解更不如范镇。因此在音乐史上,司马光的音乐观几乎无人提及。但他的音乐观并非毫无意义。通过对于司马光与范镇之间产生的争论进行考察和分析,可以看出司马光的音乐观以及其对后世的影响。
[Abstract]:In the Northern Song Dynasty, Si Maguang was the editor of Zizhitong Jian, a masterpiece of historiography, and the controversy between him and Fan Zhen about music and law also left a page in history that can not be ignored. Si Maguang and Fan Zhen are close friends, but on the issue of music law, they hold their own views, do not give in to each other. So repeated discussion and heckling, back and forth letters have reached tens of thousands of words. Zhu Xi's assessment of the debate is low, pointing out that Si Maguang's views are worse than Fan Zhen's. Therefore, in the history of music, Si Maguang's view of music is hardly mentioned. But his view of music is not meaningless. Through the investigation and analysis of the controversy between Si Maguang and Fan Zhen, we can see that Si Maguang's view of music and its influence on later generations.
【作者单位】: 日本梅光学院;
【分类号】:J609.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 郭晓东;;论司马光“中和”学说及其在道学史上的意义与局限[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李俸s,
本文编号:2063645
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/mzqiyue/2063645.html