当代书法评判标准的思考

发布时间：2018-03-10 08:06

本文选题：当代书法　切入点：祭侄稿　出处：《中国书法》2013年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正当代书法评判,我以为可从学术层面评判作品优劣,这样就抛开了其他非学术标准。具体说来,可从四点人手。内容的原创性一件书法作品,如果在书写中自觉或不自觉地呈现了情感、思想、意趣、学养以及书法技巧的综合之境,这种呈现就达到了一种艺术的、哲学的、人文的高度。观书史上,王羲之的《兰亭序》,颜真卿的《祭侄稿》,苏东坡的《黄州寒食诗》等经典名帖,书写内容首先都是不可复制与原创,都自抒胸臆,切合自身境遇,有感而发,无意于书法而书法自佳的手稿。
[Abstract]:In judging contemporary calligraphy, I think we can judge the merits and demerits of a work on an academic level, thus setting aside other non-academic standards. To be specific, we can start with four points of hands: the originality of the content, a piece of calligraphy, If there is a combination of emotion, thought, interest, learning and calligraphy skills in writing consciously or unconsciously, this kind of presentation has reached a high level of art, philosophy, and humanism. Wang Xizhi's Orchid Pavilion, Yan Zhenqing's manuscript, Su Dongpo's Huangzhou Cold Edible Poems, etc. The writing contents are above all unrepeatable and original. They all express their own minds, suit their own circumstances, and want to express their views. A manuscript that is not intended for calligraphy but for calligraphy itself.
【作者单位】：中国集体经济杂志社;
【分类号】：J292.1

【相似文献】