朱复戡草书研究
发布时间:2018-04-13 13:23
本文选题:朱复戡 + 草书艺术 ; 参考:《河北大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:朱复戡是20世纪集金石、书、印、诗、画诸艺于一身的艺术大家。其书法最擅长篆书和草书,并将两者进行了有机结合,走出了一条独特的草书创变之路。朱复戡草书的总体艺术特色是刚健凝重,气势开张,又典雅纯正。这种风格的形成与其艺术主张密不可分。主要体现在两个方面:一是首重金石气,次求书卷气。二是非常重视草书的理法。朱复戡一生的草书创作大致经历了三个主要时期:“海上旧体”:主要师法吴昌硕、沈曾植。“由晚明上追二王”:此期朱复戡草书大致并行呈现两种面貌,一是精研二王草书之作,二是以金石气兼融二王草书之作。前者占据了主流。此期是其以篆作草的第一探索期。“以篆作草,兼取隶章”:50-60年代,朱复戡对二王草书的学习运用达到精熟自如的境界。70年代是其以篆作草的第二探索期,也是其刚健凝重、气势开张的草书风格成熟期。80年代,朱复戡草书更趋刚健磅礴、古朴凝重,进入其以篆作草的第三探索期,也是其碑帖结合探索的深化期。朱复戡既是草书大家,又致力于草书研究。其草书理论体现在四个方面:一是《修改补充草诀歌》。在传世使用最广影响最大的韩道亨《草诀百韵歌》的基础上,通过修改补充,归纳概括了草书的书写方法,充实了《草诀歌》的内容,最重要的是再次明确了“草书本由篆书出”和“以篆作草”的重要性。二是对二王草书的研究。主要集中在跋《澄清堂帖》和跋馆本《十七帖》中,涉及到文学、史学、书学、版本考证等多个方面。三是勘误怀素《自叙帖》。以《说文解字》为依据,对《自叙帖》中76处乖误逐一勘误,彰显出一位文字学家严谨的治学风范。四是借鉴京剧、武术与草书的关系来阐释草理。打破艺术门类的界限,由此及彼,提出了通俗易懂又见解独到的草书观点。朱复戡草书对当代草书的影响体现在:进一步证实了碑帖结合的巨大可能性;要全面对待草书传统;塑造了草书创作阳刚美的典范。
[Abstract]:Chu Fu-Kan is the 20 th century collection of gold stone, books, printing, poetry, painting art in one.His calligraphy is very good at seal script and cursive script, and combines them organically, and takes a unique road of cursive writing innovation.The overall artistic features of Zhu Fu-Kan's cursive script are vigorous, vigorous, and elegant and pure.The formation of this style is inextricably linked to its artistic propositions.Mainly reflected in two aspects: first, the first heavy stone gas, secondary book-scroll gas.Second, great importance is attached to the rationalism of cursive script.The cursive writing of Zhu Fukan's life has experienced three main periods: the old body at sea: Wu Changshuo and Shen Zengzhi.From the late Ming Dynasty to pursue the two kings: this period of Chu Fu-Kan cursive approximately presents two kinds of features, one is to study the two king cursive works, the other is the combination of gold and stone.The former dominates the mainstream.This period is the first exploration period in which seal character is used as grass.In the 50-60 's, Zhu Fujian's study and application of the two kings' cursive script reached a state of perfect familiarity. The 70s was the second exploration period of his cursive style, and it was also the mature stage of his vigorous and vigorous cursive style in the 1980s.Zhu Fu-Kan cursive book more vigorous and magnificent, simple and dignified, into its seal as grass for the third exploration period, but also the deepening period of its tablets combined with exploration.Zhu Fu-Kan is not only cursive people, but also devoted to cursive research.The theory of cursive script is embodied in four aspects: one is to revise and supplement the song of grass.On the basis of Han Dao Heng's song of hundred rhymes of the grass formula, which is the most widely used in the world, and through the revision and supplement, this paper summarizes the writing methods of the cursive script and enriches the content of the song.The most important thing is to clarify the importance of cursive script published by seal script and seal script as grass again.Second, the study of the two kings cursive book.It is mainly concentrated in the postscript "clarifying Tang Post" and the Postscript Pavilion "Seventeen posts", involving literature, historiography, bookology, edition textual research and so on.Third, corrigendum "self-narration".On the basis of "Shuo Wen Jie Zi", 76 errors in "self-narration" are corrected one by one, which shows the rigorous scholarly style of a philologist.Fourth, draw lessons from the relationship between Beijing Opera, martial arts and cursive script to explain the grass.Breaking the boundaries of art, from this to the other, put forward an easy-to-understand and original view of cursive script.The influence of Zhu Fu Kan cursive script on contemporary cursive script is reflected in: further confirmation of the great possibility of the combination of tablet and placard, the comprehensive treatment of cursive tradition, and the creation of a model of masculine beauty in cursive writing.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:J292.1
【参考文献】
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 李阳洪;民国书法社团研究(1912-1949)[D];中国艺术研究院;2014年
2 金丹;包世臣书学的重新审视[D];南京艺术学院;2005年
3 许全胜;沈曾植年谱长编[D];华东师范大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 刘鹤翔;清末民初书法现代性研究[D];中国艺术研究院;2014年
2 付瑶;楼钥题跋研究[D];暨南大学;2013年
3 岑欢科;沙孟海书学思想考论[D];杭州师范大学;2012年
4 胡亚萍;黄道周行草书管窥[D];河南大学;2010年
5 李宇平;碑派笔法研究[D];西南大学;2008年
6 单昆军;民国时期对康有为《广艺舟双楫》的批评[D];南京师范大学;2006年
,本文编号:1744695
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/shufayishu/1744695.html

