论标准的合法性与复杂——关于当代书法评价体系的再思考

发布时间：2018-04-18 00:25

本文选题：当代书法评价体系 + 标准　；参考：《中国书法》2016年04期

【摘要】：本文目的不是提出具体的书法评价标准,而是关于书法评价体系有关元问题的理论思考。主要涉及的内容是关于标准存在客观性的证明,并由此谈到不同的书法样式有不同的评价标准。作者的主要观点是:书法评价有客观的标准,但客观标准由一般规定性和特殊规定性构成;适用于各种书法类型的"当代书法评价体系"作为一般规定性,只是书法的必要保障和最低标准,而不同类型的书法还需要在满足一般规定性的基础上,体现各自类型的特殊规定性。而显然特殊规定性的制定比一般规定性更加复杂。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is not to put forward the concrete criteria of calligraphy evaluation, but to think about the meta-problems of calligraphy evaluation system.The main content is the proof of the objectivity of the standard, and the different calligraphy styles have different evaluation standards.The author's main point of view is that there are objective criteria for calligraphy evaluation, but the objective criteria are composed of general and special prescriptions, and the "contemporary calligraphy evaluation system", which is suitable for various types of calligraphy, is regarded as a general stipulation.Only the necessary guarantee and minimum standard of calligraphy, and different types of calligraphy also need to meet the general requirements on the basis of their own types of special requirements.It is obvious that the formulation of special provisions is more complex than that of general rules.
【作者单位】：北京大学新闻与传播学院;
【分类号】：J292.1

【相似文献】