关于“李文田跋汪中旧藏定武兰亭”的踪迹及其相关问题

发布时间：2018-05-16 07:24

本文选题：定武兰亭 + 李文田　；参考：《美术观察》2017年02期

【摘要】：正在书法史尤其是"兰亭学"的研究领域,清末李文田(1834—1895)跋《定武兰亭》拓本,质疑《兰亭序》真伪,是学术史上的一件大事。众所周知,在上世纪60年代,南京郊外出土了东晋王兴之夫妇、谢鲲墓志后,郭沫若随即发表了著名的《从王谢墓志的出土论到兰亭序的真伪》文章(《兰亭论辩》,1973年文物出版社。以下略称"郭文"),对《兰亭序》的真伪提出怀疑,从而在中国的文化界和学术界中引发了一场有关《兰亭序》真伪的大辩论,这场辩论意义重大,影响深远。正因为郭文中抄录了"李文田跋汪中旧藏定武兰亭"
[Abstract]:In the field of calligraphy history, especially in the study of Lanting, Li Wentian Li Wentian 1834-1895) postscript "Ding Wu Lan Ting" to question the authenticity of "Orchid Pavilion Preface" is a major event in academic history. As we all know, in the 1960s, after the tomb of Xie Kun, a couple of Wang Xing of the Eastern Jin Dynasty, was unearthed on the outskirts of Nanjing, Guo Moruo then published a famous article "from the unearthed epitaph of Wang Xie to the authenticity of the Orchid Pavilion" (debate on Lanting, 1973 Cultural relics Publishing House). The following is referred to as "Guo Wen", who doubts the authenticity of "Orchid Pavilion", thus causing a great debate on the authenticity of "Orchid Pavilion" in Chinese cultural and academic circles. This debate is of great significance and far-reaching influence. Because Guo Wen-wen copied "Li Wentian and Wangzhongjiu Zang Ding Wulanting"
【作者单位】：广州美术学院;
【分类号】：J292.1

【相似文献】