论康有为八分观中对所引刘熙载文句的误读

发布时间：2018-05-16 17:14

本文选题：分变 + 书概　；参考：《中国书法》2017年06期

【摘要】：本文通过对刘熙载主张的隶乃通称,八分指汉隶和康有为主张的隶乃伪名,八分乃通称的不同,刘熙载主张的"分别之分"说和康有为主张的"分数之分"说的不同的分析,再结合对文本前后关系的把握,发现刘熙载文句的本义是否定"分数"之说,用论分来把握八分区别于其他书体的特征,虽勉强认为可借"分数"来论述书体间的继承关系,但他并未主张以"分书"统称各种书体。因此康有为对刘熙载文句的引用仅是从字面意思来理解其含义,存在一定程度的"误读"。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author analyzes the differences between the Li name of Liu Xizai's proposition, the eight points of Han Li and Kang Youwei's claim, the difference of eight points, the difference between Liu Xizai's theory of "division of separation" and that of Kang Youwei's theory of "division of fractions". Combined with the understanding of the relationship between the two parts of the text, it is found that the original meaning of the Liu Xi text sentence is to deny the theory of "fraction", and to use the theory to grasp the characteristics of the eight points which are different from the other types of books, although it is reluctantly believed that the inheritance relationship between the calligraphy styles can be discussed by "fraction". However, he did not advocate the division of the book as a variety of books. Therefore, Kang Youwei's reference to Liu Xi articles is only a literal interpretation of its meaning, there is a certain degree of "misreading".
【作者单位】：西安交通大学中国书法系;
【分类号】：J292.1

【相似文献】