陈洪绶《宝纶堂集》的版本关系——以哈佛藏本为中心

发布时间：2018-06-17 18:48

  本文选题：宝纶堂集 + 陈洪绶　； 参考：《美苑》2015年01期

【摘要】：正(三)关于哈佛本的疑问和解释1.沈跋中的两个问题沈跋提供了两点重要信息,也留下了两重悬疑:一、书眉补录诗系孟氏搜辑,但不知是孟氏原迹还是沈氏重抄的?二、补刻书页是沈氏加上去的,但是"割其所无,合而订之"这句话有歧义,被割的是哪个本子?"沈藏残本"和"孟藏完本"分别分布在哈佛本的哪个部分?这两个问题其实是互相关联的,可以提出两种可能性,并列表简示如下:
[Abstract]:(3) questions and explanations about Harvard Ben 1. The two questions in Shen's postscript, Shen postscript, provide two important information and leave two doubts: first, the supplementary poems in the book's eyebrow were collected by Mencius, but I do not know if it was Mencius' original trace or Shen's rewriting. Second, the completion of the engraving page is added by Shen, but the sentence "cut what it does not have, and make it together" is ambiguous. Which book was cut off? ". Which part of Harvard does Shen Zang residual Ben and Meng Zang Wan Ben distribute respectively? The two questions are in fact interrelated, and two possibilities can be raised, as summarized in the table below:
【分类号】：J292.1
，

本文编号：2032077