也谈《瘗鹤铭》非陶弘景书

发布时间：2018-06-24 04:55

本文选题：瘗鹤铭 + 皮日休　；参考：《中国书法》2013年09期

【摘要】：正《瘗鹤铭》摩崖刻石,由于其艺术性极高,故自北宋出水以来就引起了人们的广泛重视。因为碑上没有书写年代(只有干支),也没有书者真名(只有化名),故何代所刻、何人所书就成了千古之谜。从北宋至今,一直争议不休。其中影响较大的说法就有东晋王羲之、梁代陶弘景、隋人和唐代王瓒、颜真卿、顾况、皮日休书等多种说法。因隋代没壬辰和甲午两个干支而被排除。其中因为东晋王羲之和梁代陶弘景属于南朝,曾以其为例,引起过南北书风异同之辨,特别值得关注。其他四人皆为唐人,主要是个人风格问题,故此处不想多说。
[Abstract]:Because of its high artistic nature, it has aroused widespread attention since the Northern Song Dynasty. Because there is no writing age (only dry branch) and no real name of the book (only the pseudonym), the book has become a mystery. Since the Northern Song Dynasty, there has been a lot of controversy. Among them, there have been great influence. There are many statements in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, Wang Xizhi, Liang Daitao, Sui and Tang Dynasty Wang Zan, Yan Zhenqing, Gu Kuang, and Pei day, which are excluded because of the two branches of the Sui Dynasty and the Southern Dynasty, because the East Jin Wang Xizhi and Liang Daitao are in the Southern Dynasties, which used to distinguish the differences and similarities between the north and the south, and the other four. People are all Chinese people, mainly because of their personal style. Therefore, they do not want to say more.
【作者单位】：中国艺术研究院;
【分类号】：J292.1

【共引文献】