当代书法研究接受视角探论
发布时间：2018-12-10 16:32
【摘要】：目前书法研究中,从接受视角来探讨书家、作品、流派的现象已蔚然成一趋势,而关于接受这一视角方法论的探讨尚付阙如。本论文主要探讨了接受理论与传统书学研究方法的不同,接受视角下的书法研究成果及其主要存在问题,以期对当下书法接受研究作一学理性思考。本论文共分为四章。第一章就接受理论在书法研究中的基本情况作出介绍,指出接受美学的理论贡献,在中国的发展和书法研究领域中的接受成果。第二章就接受理论与书法研究的学理结合进行探讨,指出接受美学对中国书法研究的启示及需要从哪几个层面进行展开。第三章主要从书家形象、书法经典形成、书法语辞、序列的嬗变三个层面,论述了当下书法接受的研究成果。第四章主要对当下书法接受研究成果存在的问题进行分析,指出接受视角的方法论局限与不足。本文认为,目前书法接受研究著述虽然日趋增多,但大都对接受理论没有充分理解就简单套用,有接受之“名”而无接受之“实”,存在诸多问题。而关于书法接受研究中经典书家与经典作品的接受、宏观接受史的研究、方法论的探讨远远没有展开,书法接受研究亟需加强。
[Abstract]:At present, in the study of calligraphy, it has become a trend to probe into the phenomenon of calligraphers, works and schools from the perspective of acceptance, but there is no discussion on the methodology of accepting this perspective. This paper mainly discusses the differences between the reception theory and the traditional calligraphy research methods, the research results of calligraphy from the perspective of acceptance and its main problems, in order to make a rational thinking on the present calligraphy acceptance research. This thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the basic situation of reception theory in calligraphy research, pointing out the theoretical contribution of reception aesthetics, the development of China and the acceptance results in the field of calligraphy research. The second chapter discusses the combination of reception theory and calligraphy research, and points out the enlightenment of reception aesthetics to Chinese calligraphy research and the level from which it needs to be carried out. The third chapter mainly discusses the research achievements of calligraphy acceptance from three aspects: the image of calligrapher, the formation of calligraphy classics, the words of calligraphy and the evolution of sequence. The fourth chapter mainly analyzes the problems existing in the present research results of calligraphy acceptance, and points out the limitations and shortcomings of the methodology of reception perspective. This paper holds that although the number of calligraphy acceptance studies is increasing, most of them are simply applied without sufficient understanding of the acceptance theory, and there are many problems in accepting the "name" but not the "reality" of the acceptance. However, the study of classical calligraphers and classical works, the study of macroscopic history of acceptance and the study of methodology in the study of calligraphy acceptance are far from being carried out, and the study of calligraphy acceptance needs to be strengthened.
【学位授予单位】：中国艺术研究院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：J292.1
[Abstract]:At present, in the study of calligraphy, it has become a trend to probe into the phenomenon of calligraphers, works and schools from the perspective of acceptance, but there is no discussion on the methodology of accepting this perspective. This paper mainly discusses the differences between the reception theory and the traditional calligraphy research methods, the research results of calligraphy from the perspective of acceptance and its main problems, in order to make a rational thinking on the present calligraphy acceptance research. This thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the basic situation of reception theory in calligraphy research, pointing out the theoretical contribution of reception aesthetics, the development of China and the acceptance results in the field of calligraphy research. The second chapter discusses the combination of reception theory and calligraphy research, and points out the enlightenment of reception aesthetics to Chinese calligraphy research and the level from which it needs to be carried out. The third chapter mainly discusses the research achievements of calligraphy acceptance from three aspects: the image of calligrapher, the formation of calligraphy classics, the words of calligraphy and the evolution of sequence. The fourth chapter mainly analyzes the problems existing in the present research results of calligraphy acceptance, and points out the limitations and shortcomings of the methodology of reception perspective. This paper holds that although the number of calligraphy acceptance studies is increasing, most of them are simply applied without sufficient understanding of the acceptance theory, and there are many problems in accepting the "name" but not the "reality" of the acceptance. However, the study of classical calligraphers and classical works, the study of macroscopic history of acceptance and the study of methodology in the study of calligraphy acceptance are far from being carried out, and the study of calligraphy acceptance needs to be strengthened.
【学位授予单位】：中国艺术研究院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：J292.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 向净卿;;“爨体”书法近现代接受史研究[J];中国书法;2016年22期
2 赵明;;“二爨”书法批评观念与书家接受研究——兼谈其经典地位的确立[J];中国书法;2016年21期
3 陈硕;;经典、传说与典故——论《夏承碑》接受史中的若干问题[J];中国书法;2016年18期
4 王磊;;王蘧常对沈曾植书法的接受与创变[J];中国书法;2016年15期
5 西岛慎一;郭豫之;;近代日本对王羲之书法的接受略考[J];中华书画家;2016年08期
6 王高升;;白蕉书法接受变迁[J];中国书法;2016年05期
7 张红军;;关于王羲之书法接受的思想衍说[J];文化艺术研究;2015年01期
8 龚勇富;;从接受美学的角度看行走在实用与审美双轨上的中国书法[J];书法赏评;2014年01期
9 杨晓慧;;唐五代王维绘画接受研究[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年02期
10 张冰;;王献之接受史的几个问题[J];中国书法;2013年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 周峰;元明清赵孟，
本文编号：2370880
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/shufayishu/2370880.html
