技术与观念的艺术实践泛化——康有为与清代碑学篆隶为源的笔法观检证
发布时间：2018-12-11 07:37
【摘要】：无论是书法史还是书法实践,理论的叙述都扮演着一个重要的角色。但是,理论的叙述有些是先验的,有些是实践层面筛选后的泛化,这便造成技术与观念的艺术错位。这种错位既有其合理的文化规训,又对书法实践,乃至艺术发展形成阻碍。通过对这一错位的厘清,以及对其存在语境的还原,有助于我们对传统书法理论的辩证认知和有效借助传统理论来指导我们的实践,以及认清在书法史的发展脉络中不曾更易的正统。
[Abstract]:Theoretical narration plays an important role in both calligraphy history and calligraphy practice. However, some of the theoretical narration is transcendental, and some is the generalization of practical screening, which results in the artistic dislocation of technology and concept. This kind of dislocation not only has its reasonable cultural discipline, but also hinders the practice of calligraphy and even the development of art. Through the clarification of this dislocation and the restoration of its existing context, it is helpful to our dialectical cognition of the traditional calligraphy theory and to guide our practice with the help of the traditional theory. And to recognize the orthodoxy that has never been easier in the development of calligraphic history.
【作者单位】： 首都师范大学中国书法文化研究院;
【分类号】：J292.1
，
本文编号：2372155
[Abstract]:Theoretical narration plays an important role in both calligraphy history and calligraphy practice. However, some of the theoretical narration is transcendental, and some is the generalization of practical screening, which results in the artistic dislocation of technology and concept. This kind of dislocation not only has its reasonable cultural discipline, but also hinders the practice of calligraphy and even the development of art. Through the clarification of this dislocation and the restoration of its existing context, it is helpful to our dialectical cognition of the traditional calligraphy theory and to guide our practice with the help of the traditional theory. And to recognize the orthodoxy that has never been easier in the development of calligraphic history.
【作者单位】： 首都师范大学中国书法文化研究院;
【分类号】：J292.1
，
本文编号：2372155
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/shufayishu/2372155.html
