“史统散而小说兴”与“史诗衰而小说兴”——冯梦龙与巴赫金小说起源思想比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-09 09:41

本文关键词：“史统散而小说兴”与“史诗衰而小说兴”——冯梦龙与巴赫金小说起源思想比较研究　出处：《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2013年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：历史、史诗与小说作为重要的叙事文类,其内积淀着特定的历史信息与文化精神,冯梦龙与巴赫金在小说起源问题上的见解为此提供了一个典型范例。他们都认定小说起源于各自民族文化的奠基时代;小说的兴起与上古历史叙事或史诗叙事的权威性失落有内在关联;历史与史诗叙事是崇高的、官方的、绝对的、过去的,小说则是低俗的、民间的、面向当下现实的文类;历史与史诗需要一种权威的、统一的思想作为其内核,小说则不仅是最需要思想、而且是需要多种思想背景的文类,多种思想并存几乎是小说与生俱来的文化基因。冯梦龙和巴赫金都通过有意盲视中西文论史上的权威成见,获得了各自对小说与历史、小说与史诗的过人洞见。
[Abstract]:As an important narrative genre, history, epic and novel contain specific historical information and cultural spirit. Feng Menglong and Bakhtin's views on the origin of the novel provide a typical example for this. They both believe that the novel originated from the foundation of their respective national culture. The rise of the novel is intrinsically related to the loss of the authority of the ancient historical narrative or the epic narrative. History and epic narration are lofty, official, absolute, past, novels are vulgar, folk, facing to the present reality of literature; History and epic need a kind of authoritative, unified thought as its core, and fiction is not only the most need for thought, but also need a variety of ideological background of the genre. Both Feng Menglong and Bakhtin have gained their own insights into novels and history, novels and epics by deliberately blind looking at the authoritative prejudices in the history of Chinese and Western literary theory.
【作者单位】：湖北师范学院文学院;
【基金】：2010年度国家社会科学基金“叙事形式政治潜素与政治意义及其生成模式研究”(10BZW004)
【分类号】：I106.4;I0-03
【正文快照】： 作为形式构成之一的叙事文类与文体是否积淀着特定的历史信息与文化精神?众所周知,从俄国形式主义到结构主义的文论家都是否定的,但弗·杰姆逊这样的学者在《政治无意识》中却明确断言一切叙事文类与文体都携带着其起源时的“历史信息”,也就是说,历史、史诗、小说这些叙事文

【共引文献】