艺术史的语言

发布时间：2018-01-10 13:07

  本文关键词：艺术史的语言　出处：《新美术》2013年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 艺术史 语言

【摘要】：正一衰退的对话最近十年出现了这样一件不可思议的事情,相当多的艺术史家对于"理论不充分"而捶胸顿足,《新文学史》[New Literary History]已经极好地传达了这种声音,比起我看到的艺术史家们自己的任何一本杂志,《新文学史》传达的观点更具代表性。其中呈现出三种观点:库尔特·福斯特[Kurt W.Forster]描述了在《批判学报》[Kritiscbe Bericbte]中提出的一条形式相当完整犀利的线索,谴责形式主义,谴责我们艺术史趋同于观念史,谴责我们对于自己所研究的艺术品过于肯定,谴责我们只关注于高雅艺术而忽略像电影和广告招贴画这类艺术,谴责我们对于自己的预见和它们的社会根源缺乏自觉意识,谴责我们无法发展出一种真正的社会历史研究法:"充分理解往昔人工制品的唯一手段在于对维系其生产与使用的思想体系以及如今已经将艺术品变成一种极富特权的消费品、说教产品的文化趣味的双重批判。"相比之下,詹姆斯·阿克曼[James S.Ackerman]认为我们问题的根源在于一种杂乱的哲学基础:"我的同行已经不知不觉地将他们的方法根植于为科学
[Abstract]:In the last decade, such an incredible thing has occurred in the recessionary dialogue, where quite a number of art historians beat their chests at the "inadequate theory", the History of New Literature. [New Literary History has delivered this sound better than any of the art historians I've seen in any of their own magazines. "A History of New Literature" conveys a more representative view. There are three points of view: Kurt Foster. [Kurt W. Forster describes in the critical Journal. [Kritiscbe Bericbte offers a rather complete and sharp clue, denouncing formalism and the convergence of our history of art with the history of ideas. Denounce us for being too sure of the art we study, for focusing only on elegant art and for neglecting art such as movies and advertising posters. Condemn our lack of awareness of our own foresight and of their social roots. Denouncing our inability to develop a true socio-historical study: " The only way to fully understand the artifacts of the past lies in the intellectual system that sustains their production and use and has now turned art into a highly privileged consumer product. The double critique of the cultural tastes of preaching products. "by contrast, James Ackerman. [James S. Ackerman believes that the root of our problem lies in a messy philosophical foundation: "my peers have unwittingly rooted their methods in science."
【分类号】：J110.9
【正文快照】： 一衰退的对话最近十年出现了这样一件不可思议的事情，相当多的艺术史家对于“理论不充分”而捶胸顿足，《新文学史》〔Ne翔五z扮ra创Hi，to叫已经极好地传达了这种声音，，比起我看到的艺术史家们自己的任何一本杂志，《新文学史》传达的观点更具代表性。其中呈现出三种观点:

本文编号：1405369