对“理论的批评化”和“批评的理论化”争论的反思

发布时间：2018-03-01 08:22

本文关键词： 批评理论化理论批评化批评理论文学批评　出处：《华中师范大学》2007年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 对文学研究趋势的认定是使文学批评更加科学化的内在要求。在“理论的批评化”和“批评的理论化”的争论中，认为批评实践更需要从传统文学理论的失语背景上加以提倡，是“批评化”这一趋势认定的最初原因。研究者出于对批评的偏重，提倡“理论的批评化”；而“批评的理论化”则是指研究者对具体批评中引申出的理论问题更加重视。实用批评和理论批评的偏重问题深化为对文学批评和文学理论发展趋势的理解问题。当“批评理论”作为“批评化”和“理论化”的争论核心时，对文学批评的探讨就涉及到应该如何评价文学理论和文学批评，“批评化”和“理论化”成为了对“批评理论”进行定位研究的运作方式。本文分别从批评理论的引入、“理论的批评化”和“批评的理论化”争论的阶段分析、从接受的角度看待批评理论、文学性和“审美意识形态”、从批评理论探讨“批评化”和“理论化”的意义等五个方面来分析这场争论，并补充背景，加以总结。本文认为，只有了解批评理论这一西方文学研究术语和现象，才能对这场“批评化”和“理论化”的争论进行阶段分析。批评理论既有中国化的背景，也取决于接受者的思维方式，这种接受角度由中国文艺界对文学性的界定来决定。基于此，“批评化”和“理论化”就不只是侧重于实用批评或理论批评的问题，更是对文本研究对象的界定问题。只有扩大批评对象，把所有的社会文本纳入文学批评中，才能对批评理论进行恰当的定位，并深入理解“理论的批评化”和“批评的理论化”两种主张。针对“理论的批评化”和“批评的理论化”，本文探讨了如下问题：第一，为什么社会文本的批评化运作能够得以实现；第二，摆脱批评的文学感受能否实现的问题；第三，，对“批评化”和“理论化”的“游戏”特征的分析。以上分析区分了文学存在方式和批评存在方式，并把社会文本和文学文本纳入到“批评化”和“理论化”的范畴，明确批评与文学所要表达内容的差异，指出作为自我建构的批评理论，是以“批评化”和“理论化”的方式来实现的。
[Abstract]:The recognition of the trend of literary research is the internal requirement of making literary criticism more scientific. In the debates of "theoretical criticism" and "criticism theorization", it is believed that the practice of criticism should be advocated more from the background of aphasia of traditional literary theory. Is the initial reason for the tendency to be "critical". To advocate "criticism of theory" and "theorization of criticism" means that researchers pay more attention to the theoretical problems derived from specific criticism. The emphasis of practical criticism and theoretical criticism is deepened into literary criticism and literary theory. When "critical theory" is the core of "criticism" and "theorization", The discussion of literary criticism involves how to evaluate literary theory and literary criticism, and "critique" and "theorization" have become the operating mode of positioning research on "critical theory". This paper analyzes the stage of the controversy between the introduction of the critical theory, the criticism of the theory and the theorization of the criticism, and views the theory of criticism from the perspective of acceptance. Literature and aesthetic ideology are analyzed from the five aspects of critical theory, the significance of criticism and theorization, and the background is supplemented and summarized. Only by understanding the term and phenomenon of western literary research, can we analyze the controversy of "criticism" and "theorization" in stages. Criticism theory has both the background of Sinicization and the mode of thinking of the recipient. This angle of acceptance is determined by the definition of literariness in the Chinese literary and art circles. Based on this, "criticism" and "theorization" do not focus solely on practical or theoretical criticism. Only by expanding the object of criticism and incorporating all social texts into literary criticism, can the critical theory be properly positioned. And deeply understand the two propositions of "theoretical criticism" and "critical theorization". In view of "the criticism of theory" and "the theorization of criticism", this paper discusses the following questions: first, why the critical operation of social text can be realized; second, whether the literary feeling of getting rid of criticism can be realized; thirdly, An analysis of the characteristics of "game" of "criticism" and "theorization". The above analysis distinguishes between literary existence and critical existence, and brings social text and literary text into the category of "critical" and "theorized". This paper clarifies the difference between the content of criticism and that of literature, and points out that the criticism theory, as a self-construction theory, is realized by means of "criticism" and "theorization".
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I06

【引证文献】