中国文学人类学历史起点中的理论问题及反思

发布时间：2018-05-07 10:57

本文选题：中国文学人类学 + 历史起点　；参考：《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年01期

【摘要】：从神话维度、剑桥神话仪式学派和弗莱神话原型理论的关联性、还有方法论方面去探究中国文学人类学的历史起点及其现代学术传统,是中国学术界在探讨中国文学人类学历史起点问题中的一种"共识"。这种"共识"既造成了对20世纪上半叶"中国文学人类学"多元性研究的遮蔽,也造成了介绍台湾"文学人类学"研究状况时的某种"偏狭性"认识。中国文学人类学历史起点问题的探讨内蕴着"文学人类学是什么"的问题,只有对"文学人类学"的内涵做出较充分地解释,才能最大限度地划定其对象、疆域及范围等,中国文学人类学历史起点的问题才能够在逻辑上自洽,理论上被言说,被讨论。这就须注意"中国文学人类学"历史生成的思想史语境。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of mythology, the relationship between Cambridge mythology ritual school and Frey's mythological archetypal theory, as well as the methodology to explore the historical starting point of Chinese literary anthropology and its modern academic tradition, It is a kind of "consensus" in the discussion of the historical starting point of Chinese literary anthropology. This "consensus" not only obscured the pluralistic study of "Chinese Literary Anthropology" in the first half of the 20th century, but also gave rise to some kind of "intolerance" in introducing the research situation of "Literary Anthropology" in Taiwan. The discussion of the historical starting point of Chinese literary anthropology contains the question of "what is literary anthropology". Only by fully explaining the connotation of "literary anthropology" can the object, territory and scope of "literary anthropology" be delimited to the maximum extent. The problem of the historical starting point of Chinese literary anthropology can be logically consistent, theoretically stated and discussed. Therefore, we should pay attention to the historical context of thought generated by the history of Chinese literary anthropology.
【作者单位】：曲靖师范学院人文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(10ZD100)
【分类号】：I0-05

【参考文献】