翻译中的选择与顺应：Gone with the Wind两个中译本的对比研究
发布时间：2018-08-07 10:18
【摘要】： 翻译策略的选择和翻译评论的标准一直是翻译研究中的争论焦点。在整个翻译历史中，几乎所有的争论焦点都集中在译者在翻译过程中所遇到的一些基本问题上，比如说注重形式还是内容?立足于原文文化还是译文文化?反映作者的目的还是满足读者的期待?译者在翻译的过程中做出这样或者那样的选择，而这些选择最终会影响到翻译策略和翻译标准的确定。现在很多学者和翻译研究者不遗余力地利用其他学科的研究成果并将其引入翻译研究中，希望能找到新的视角来合理的解释翻译中的问题。可以说，翻译研究在不断地吸取来自于其他学科的养分。 谢天振曾在2004年提到当代西方翻译研究中的三大突破可以被总结为两大转向：语言学转向和文化转向。哲学，语言学和翻译之间有着密不可分的关系。在某种程度上，翻译中语言学转向的出现是哲学和语言学发展的必然结果。如果没有解释哲学，现代哲学和后现代文化研究的影响，翻译领域的文化转向也不可能出现。因此，从哲学和语言学的角度研究翻译问题是可行的，也必然会扩大翻译研究的范围。 Verschueren在1999年在他的《语用学新解》这本书中提出了语用综观和语用顺应论，旨在研究和分析语言的使用。而另外一位中国的翻译研究者，胡庚申教授在2004年也出版了他的著作《翻译适应选择论》，其目的是从全新的角度分析研究翻译的本质和现象。Verschueren用选择与顺应来描述语言使用的过程。胡庚申也借用了达尔文进化论中的概念(选择与顺应)来解释翻译的过程。双方的理论都深受达尔文的进化论的影响，也都给翻译研究带来了新的视角和思考方式。因此，，在这两种理论的启迪和指导下，翻译可以被认为是一个动态的选择与顺应的过程。在这样的理论框架下，作者提出了一个翻译模式来解释翻译过程和翻译中的问题。有关讨论在语言内部和语言外部两个层次展开。用这种方式，很多翻译中争论的焦点，比如说，归化或异化，忠实或叛逆，可以被合理地解释。 如果只是从理论材料和推论来完成一篇研究论文显然是不够的。为了使本文研究更具有说服力，从语言外和语言内两个方面，作者对比研究了Gone with the Wind的两个中译本。最终得出这样的结论：翻译中充满了动态的选择与顺应。译者可以根据顺应的需要灵活地选择某一种翻译策略。译本是译者动态顺应和选择的结果。因此，用静止的绝对的观点来评价一个译文的好坏是不合适的。只有对原文结构，翻译目的，社会背景，文化需求和读者期待等因素的顺应程度最高的和最合适的译文才是可以被评论为好的译文。 Versehueren和胡庚申的理论为翻译研究提供了一个全新的角度，使我们可以有意识地对语言外和语言内的因素做全面的调查和研究来探讨翻译中的具体问题，这一点不同于只侧重于语言转换的传统的研究方法。
[Abstract]:The choice of translation strategies and the standard of translation review have always been the focus of the debate in translation studies. In the whole history of translation, almost all the focus of the debate is focused on some of the basic problems encountered by the translator in the process of translation, such as the emphasis on form or content, based on Yu Yuanwen culture or the translation culture, reflecting the author's goal. Does the translator meet the expectations of the reader? The translator makes such or a choice in the process of translation, and these choices will eventually affect the determination of translation strategies and translation standards. From the angle of view, we can reasonably explain problems in translation. It can be said that translation studies are constantly absorbing nutrients from other disciplines.
Xie Tianzhen's three breakthroughs in the study of contemporary western translation studies in the 2004 can be summed up as two turns: linguistic turn and cultural turn. Philosophy, linguistics and translation have an inseparable relationship. To a certain extent, the emergence of linguistic turn in translation is the inevitable result of the development of philosophy and linguistics. With the influence of interpretation philosophy, modern philosophy and post-modern cultural studies, cultural turn in the field of translation can not appear. Therefore, it is feasible to study translation problems from the perspective of philosophy and linguistics, and it will inevitably expand the scope of translation studies.
In 1999, Verschueren proposed a pragmatic and pragmatic adaptation in his new pragmatic interpretation of pragmatics, which aims to study and analyze the use of language. While another Chinese translation researcher, Professor Hu Gengshen, published his book "adaptation choice theory" in 2004. The purpose is to analyze and study translation from a new perspective. The nature and phenomenon.Verschueren uses the choice and adaptation to describe the process of language use. Hu Gengshen also borrows the concept of Darwin's evolutionary theory (choice and adaptation) to explain the process of translation. Both theories are deeply influenced by Darwin's theory of evolution, and both bring new perspectives and ways of thinking to translation studies. Under the enlightenment and guidance of the two theories, translation can be considered a dynamic process of selection and adaptation. Under such a theoretical framework, the author puts forward a translation model to explain the translation process and the problems in translation. The discussion is carried out at the two levels in the language and outside the language. In this way, many translations are disputed. The focus, for example, domestication or alienation, loyalty or treason, can be reasonably explained.
In order to make this study more convincing, the author contrastive study of the two Chinese versions of Gone with the Wind, in order to make this study more convincing, and finally draw the conclusion that the translation is full of dynamic choice and adaptation. A translation strategy is chosen flexibly according to the needs of adaptation. Translation is the result of the translator's dynamic adaptation and choice. Therefore, it is not appropriate to evaluate the good or bad of a translation with a static and absolute view. The highest degree of adaptation to the original structure, the translation purpose, the social background, the cultural needs and the expectations of the readers is the highest. The most appropriate translation is a good translation that can be commented.
The theory of Versehueren and Hu Gengshen provides a new angle for translation studies, which enables us to make a thorough investigation and study of the factors in and out of the language and to explore the specific problems in translation, which is different from the traditional methods of research which focus only on the translation of language.
【学位授予单位】：合肥工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：H315.9;I046
本文编号：2169715
[Abstract]:The choice of translation strategies and the standard of translation review have always been the focus of the debate in translation studies. In the whole history of translation, almost all the focus of the debate is focused on some of the basic problems encountered by the translator in the process of translation, such as the emphasis on form or content, based on Yu Yuanwen culture or the translation culture, reflecting the author's goal. Does the translator meet the expectations of the reader? The translator makes such or a choice in the process of translation, and these choices will eventually affect the determination of translation strategies and translation standards. From the angle of view, we can reasonably explain problems in translation. It can be said that translation studies are constantly absorbing nutrients from other disciplines.
Xie Tianzhen's three breakthroughs in the study of contemporary western translation studies in the 2004 can be summed up as two turns: linguistic turn and cultural turn. Philosophy, linguistics and translation have an inseparable relationship. To a certain extent, the emergence of linguistic turn in translation is the inevitable result of the development of philosophy and linguistics. With the influence of interpretation philosophy, modern philosophy and post-modern cultural studies, cultural turn in the field of translation can not appear. Therefore, it is feasible to study translation problems from the perspective of philosophy and linguistics, and it will inevitably expand the scope of translation studies.
In 1999, Verschueren proposed a pragmatic and pragmatic adaptation in his new pragmatic interpretation of pragmatics, which aims to study and analyze the use of language. While another Chinese translation researcher, Professor Hu Gengshen, published his book "adaptation choice theory" in 2004. The purpose is to analyze and study translation from a new perspective. The nature and phenomenon.Verschueren uses the choice and adaptation to describe the process of language use. Hu Gengshen also borrows the concept of Darwin's evolutionary theory (choice and adaptation) to explain the process of translation. Both theories are deeply influenced by Darwin's theory of evolution, and both bring new perspectives and ways of thinking to translation studies. Under the enlightenment and guidance of the two theories, translation can be considered a dynamic process of selection and adaptation. Under such a theoretical framework, the author puts forward a translation model to explain the translation process and the problems in translation. The discussion is carried out at the two levels in the language and outside the language. In this way, many translations are disputed. The focus, for example, domestication or alienation, loyalty or treason, can be reasonably explained.
In order to make this study more convincing, the author contrastive study of the two Chinese versions of Gone with the Wind, in order to make this study more convincing, and finally draw the conclusion that the translation is full of dynamic choice and adaptation. A translation strategy is chosen flexibly according to the needs of adaptation. Translation is the result of the translator's dynamic adaptation and choice. Therefore, it is not appropriate to evaluate the good or bad of a translation with a static and absolute view. The highest degree of adaptation to the original structure, the translation purpose, the social background, the cultural needs and the expectations of the readers is the highest. The most appropriate translation is a good translation that can be commented.
The theory of Versehueren and Hu Gengshen provides a new angle for translation studies, which enables us to make a thorough investigation and study of the factors in and out of the language and to explore the specific problems in translation, which is different from the traditional methods of research which focus only on the translation of language.
【学位授予单位】：合肥工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：H315.9;I046
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 雷艳;小说对话翻译中会话含义的传达[D];中南大学;2012年
本文编号：2169715
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2169715.html
