美术评价的标准

发布时间：2018-02-04 12:37

本文关键词： 个人好恶张彦远评价标准搜尽奇峰打草稿论画外师造化邓椿画史朱景玄董源 　出处：《美术观察》2016年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正普通大众欣赏美术作品时,大都止于感受阶段,即便偶尔发些议论,姑妄言之,也无关宏旨,并不需要什么评价标准。但是,当对作品进行分析和阐释,特别是要做出评价时,就不再是一般的欣赏,而进入了美术批评或称美术评论的范畴。美术评论是一种理性的认知和判断,它需要尽可能地排除个人好恶,比较客观、公正地认识和评价对象。说到评价,毫无疑问,不能没有标准。对任何事物的评价,标准都是必要的前提。评价的结果是依据标准推演出来,虽然这种推导关系或明显
[Abstract]:When the general public appreciates art works, most of them stop at the stage of feeling. Even if the occasional comments are made, it is also irrelevant, and there is no need for any evaluation criteria. However, when the works are analyzed and interpreted. Especially to make an evaluation, it is no longer a general appreciation, but into the category of art criticism or art criticism. Art criticism is a kind of rational cognition and judgment, it needs to rule out personal likes and dislikes as much as possible. When it comes to evaluation, there is no doubt that there can be no lack of standards. The evaluation of any thing, the standard is the necessary premise. The evaluation results are derived from the criteria. Although this derivation may be apparent
【作者单位】：中国艺术研究院;中国画学会;
【分类号】：J05
【正文快照】： 普通大众欣赏美术作品时,大都止于感受阶段,即便偶尔发些议论,姑妄言能历来都受到重视,如“恶以诫世,善之,也无关宏旨,并不需要什么评价标准。但是,当对作品进行分析和阐释,特别以示后”(汉毛延寿),“明劝戒,著升是要做出评价时,就不再是一般的欣赏,而进人了美术批评或称美术

【相似文献】