“文学终结论”的中国之旅

发布时间：2018-05-14 19:13

本文选题：米勒 + 文学终结论　；参考：《中国文学批评》2016年01期

【摘要】：耶鲁解构学派的代表人物希利斯·米勒在中国提出了在电信技术时代传统意义上的"文学"将不复存在的观点。中国学者将其概括为"文学终结论",并展开了热烈讨论和争鸣,其中存在一定的误读和误解。实际上,米勒所谓"终结"了的"文学"主要是指印刷时代的独特产物,具有一系列历史和技术条件,它在新的电信时代中必然发生新变和转型,作为学科的文学研究也会随之改变。同时,米勒仍然坚持和尊重文学作品特有的"施为"和"修辞"特性,并将此作为文学研究的重要内容,这意味着米勒并不是真正宣判文学的"死亡"。米勒"文学终结论"的中国旅行,即它的被理解和被误读,有着当代中国特殊的文化学术语境,体现了新世纪开端中国学界在图像与视觉文化、日常生活审美化、文化研究和全球化潮流的冲击下,对文学和文艺学学科未来发展、转型和边界等问题的核心关切与思考。
[Abstract]:The representative figure of Yale deconstruction School, Hillis Hans Muller, put forward in China the idea that "literature" in the traditional sense of the telecommunication technology era would cease to exist. Chinese scholars summarized it as "the end of Literature", and launched a heated discussion and controversy, in which there are some misreading and misunderstanding. In fact, Hans Muller's so-called "terminated" literature "mainly refers to the unique product of the printing age, with a series of historical and technical conditions, and it is bound to undergo new changes and transformations in the new telecommunications age. Literary research as a discipline will change with it. At the same time, Hans Muller still insists on and respects the characteristic of "Shi Bei" and "rhetoric" in literary works, and regards it as an important part of literary research, which means that Hans Muller is not the real "death" of literature. The Chinese travel of "the end of Literature" of Hans Muller, that is, its understanding and misreading, has a special cultural and academic context in contemporary China, which embodies the aesthetic appreciation of image and visual culture and daily life in Chinese academic circles at the beginning of the new century. Under the impact of cultural research and the trend of globalization, the core concerns and reflections on the future development, transformation and boundary of literature and art.
【作者单位】：复旦大学中文系;
【分类号】：I0

【相似文献】