在全球景观中定位中国——反思海外世界的“中国性”和“华语表述”讨论

发布时间：2018-02-02 00:53

本文关键词： 中国性离散华语表述身份认同　出处：《文艺理论研究》2013年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文旨在通过回顾海外英语世界有关"中国性"的论述,指出各种讨论中所蕴含的意识形态结构和文化操控意图,点明"中国性"话语之中存在"被误用"和"故意被误用"两个层面,而且对"中国性"的提炼也不应该只局限在政治疆域之内,而应该开放为一种既包含本土内部的文化传承与新变,也包括广布海内外的中西文化对话的进程。特别是后一维度的加入,将能够有效遏制"中国性"蜕变成一种单一的民族中心主义或国家主义。而且应当承认,在某种意义上,"中国性"必须有它的不纯粹性,甚至于枝蔓旁出,乃至变种变性。惟其如此,我们才可以领会所谓的"中州正韵"不必只是原地打转或心无旁骛地一以贯之,也可以追踪、定位所谓的离散文学和华语表述,并将其视为对"中国性"的当代增益与充实。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to point out the ideological structure and cultural manipulation intention of the overseas English-speaking world by reviewing the discussion of "Chineseness". It is pointed out that there are two levels of "being misused" and "deliberately misusing" in the discourse of "Chinese", and the refining of "Chinese" should not be confined to the political territory. It should be opened to include both the local cultural heritage and new changes, but also the wide spread of the process of Sino-Western cultural dialogue at home and abroad, especially the addition of the latter dimension. It will be able to effectively curb the transformation of "Chineseness" into a single ethnocentrism or nationalism, and it should be admitted that in a sense, "Chineseness" must have its impureness, or even grow out. Only in this way can we understand that the so-called "Zhongzhou Zhengyun" does not have to be just spinning in place or focusing on it, but can also track and locate so-called discrete literature and Chinese expressions. And regard it as the contemporary gain and enrichment of "Chinese sex".
【作者单位】：复旦大学中文系;
【分类号】：I106
【正文快照】： 上世纪90年代以来,愈演愈烈的全球化潮流,不仅在经济领域引起了各种深刻的变化,在思想界,由此激出的各种问题意识,也不断敦促时人对所谓的新/旧、传统/现代、在地/国际、民族/普世等问题做出持续地回应和思考。无论是阿皮亚(Kwame Anthony Appiah)所谓的“有根的世界主义”(ro

【相似文献】