“以律起历”疑难——“律历合一”学说之数理表述与哲学表述间的纠结

发布时间：2018-03-12 18:38

  本文选题：律历合一　切入点：“以律起历”　出处：《民族艺术》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："律历合一"学说在中国古代音乐史乃至于中国传统文化史中历时殊为长久。宋之后,"律历合一"学说日渐淡出官方史籍,然并未匿迹于学坛,注目于是说者纷然,其中的"以律起历"是该学说的核心环节。执其有者困于史料传承,举步维艰;譬其谬者振振有词,却流于以空对空想当然耳。"历史是一条河",即使是一条已经断流的河,她曾经一度的存在必定有她之所以存在的理由和根据。而她的陈迹的消失与湮没以至于最终被后人所理解,则更需假以更长的时日。
[Abstract]:The theory of "integration of laws and calendars" has lasted a long time in the history of Chinese ancient music and even in the history of Chinese traditional culture. After the Song Dynasty, the doctrine of "unification of laws and calendars" gradually faded out of official historical books, but it did not hide its roots in the field of learning. The theory of "starting with the law" is the core of the theory. Those who hold it are trapped in the inheritance of historical materials and are struggling; those who make use of the analogy have their own words, but flow on the assumption that they are empty. "History is a river," even if it is a river that has been cut off. Her existence at one time must have a reason and a basis for her existence, and the disappearance and annihilation of her past will eventually be understood by future generations, and it will take a longer period of time for her to exist.
【作者单位】： 西安石油大学音乐系;
【基金】：国家社科基金艺术学项目“明万历泰律的传承与保护研究”(15BD055)阶段性成果
【分类号】：J609.2
，

本文编号：1602791