伽茨怎样论自律他律

发布时间：2018-02-05 20:35

本文关键词： 伽茨自律他律内容美学形式美学康德　出处：《南京艺术学院学报(音乐与表演版)》2008年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：伽茨是个自律论者,他将内容美学分为教条的内容美学、感觉论的内容美学、适度的内容美学、部分的内容美学、假定论的内容美学、化身的内容美学等若干亚种,将形式美学分为经验的自律论和抽象推论的自律论两派。可能是从自律论者的立场出发,伽茨把吸收自律论和他律论双方观点的学派一律划入了内容美学学派,这使他的分类方法具有"非此即彼"性质。自律他律术语的提出者康德主张"自由美"和"附庸美"的统一,因此伽茨把康德的观点列入内容美学。但赖因霍特等学者似乎只看到康德在揭示"自由美"与"附庸美"的区别与对立,使自律论者们的形式美学在康德那里找到了支持。过去我们对自律论的批评可能还未完全摆脱偏见,没有看到自律论具有强调艺术上的个性解放这一优点,但我们应该看到艺术最终还是不能摆脱它与环境之间联系。
[Abstract]:Gatz is a self-disciplinarian who divides content aesthetics into dogmatic content aesthetics, sensualist content aesthetics, moderate content aesthetics, partial content aesthetics, false deterministic content aesthetics, incarnation content aesthetics, and so on. The formal aesthetics is divided into two schools: the self-discipline theory of experience and the autonomy theory of abstract inference. It is possible that from the standpoint of self-discipline theorists, Gartz has divided the schools that absorb the views of self-discipline theory and heteronomy theory into the aesthetic school of content. This made his classification method "either / or". Kant, the author of the term of self-discipline, advocated the unity of "beauty of freedom" and "beauty of vassal". So Gatz included Kant's views in the aesthetics of content. But some scholars such as Reinholt only seemed to see Kant revealing the difference and opposition between "beauty of freedom" and "beauty of vassal". The formal aesthetics of self-discipline has found support in Kant's. In the past, our criticism of self-discipline may not be completely free of prejudice, and we do not see the merit of self-discipline in emphasizing the emancipation of artistic individuality. But we should see that art can't get rid of the relationship between environment and art in the end.
【作者单位】：南京艺术学院音乐学院;
【分类号】：J601

【参考文献】