中国当代文艺理论的分歧及理论解决

发布时间：2018-05-02 18:37

本文选题：当代文艺理论 + 审美超越论　；参考：《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年04期

【摘要】：王元骧的"审美超越论"重犯了刘再复的"文学主体论"所犯的错误,在历史观、美学观、艺术观和思维方式上背离了唯物史观,陷入了唯心史观。过去没有从理论上彻底解决的文艺理论分歧仍在制约中国当代文艺理论的发展。1986年至1988年,文艺理论家陈涌、作家姚雪垠与刘再复进行了一场文艺论战,这场文艺论战在一定程度上深刻地反映了陈涌、姚雪垠与刘再复在文艺理论上的分歧。陈涌、姚雪垠与刘再复的这种文艺理论分歧不是中国当代文论系统转换,而是中国当代文艺理论发展在把握文艺的理想与现实的关系上的不同。中国当代文艺理论只有从理论上彻底地解决陈涌、姚雪垠和刘再复的这种文艺理论分歧,才能达到更高的阶段。
[Abstract]:Wang Yuan-xiang 's "Aesthetic Transcendence Theory" remakes the mistakes made by Liu Zaifu's "Literary subject Theory", deviates from the historical materialism and falls into the historical idealism in the view of history, aesthetics, art and mode of thinking. The differences in literary and artistic theories which were not completely resolved in the past are still restricting the development of contemporary Chinese literary and artistic theories. From 1986 to 1988, literary theorists Chen Yong, writer Yao Xueyin and Liu Zaifu engaged in a literary debate. To a certain extent, the controversy reflects the differences between Chen Yong, Yao Xueyin and Liu Zaifu in literary theory. The difference of literary theory between Chen Yong, Yao Xueyin and Liu Zaifu is not the systematic transformation of Chinese contemporary literary theory, but the difference of the development of contemporary Chinese literary theory in grasping the relationship between the ideal and reality of literature and art. In order to reach a higher stage, Chinese contemporary literary theory can reach a higher stage only by resolving the theoretical differences between Chen Yong, Yao Xueyin and Liu Zaifu.
【作者单位】：齐齐哈尔大学文学与历史文化学院;文艺报社理论部;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“中国特色社会主义文艺理论研究”(09BA013)阶段性成果
【分类号】：I0

【相似文献】