哲学阐释学与接受美学观照下的文化误译研究

发布时间：2018-09-05 09:43

【摘要】：在“源语中心论”和极端科学主义的影响下，“忠实”、“对等”成为译学研究中的金科玉律，长期占据着翻译话语的中心位置。误译，与对等原则相悖的行为，一般表现为增译，减译，意象缺失，变形，一律被贬斥为“劣译”，常常成为责难译者的武器。所谓的“误”是“源语中心论”的话语影响下产生的。这种情况下，译者长期从属于原文作者，沦为匍匐在原文脚下的奴仆，译学研究也由此陷入困境，仅仅局限在可译性或译著的优劣评判上，停滞不前。本文从对误译观念在中西传统译论中的考察入手，以“忠实”和“对等”观念的发展为对象，论述了中西传统译论的共同缺陷都是以排除误译的规定性方法为主流，指出译学的重要出路就是方法上由规定性转向描述性。进而阐述了误译产生的根源及表现形式，辨析了文化误译与错译的区别，分述了文化的内涵及文化误译的研究范围和意义。本文着重借鉴西方哲学阐释学和接受美学的若干精义来进行文化误译研究。在简要追溯西方阐释学发展的基础上，概述了伽达默尔哲学阐释学产生的重大意义及其对接受美学的影响，进而论述了阐释学与翻译的密切关系以及对文化误译研究的意义。以海德格尔的“前结构”，伽达默尔的“偏见”理论和理解的普遍性，创造性，历史性，接受美学家伊瑟尔和姚斯对阅读和读者的相关论点为依据形成本文对文化误译研究的主要方面：1)文化误译的必然性：2)文化误译作为译者美学创造性的体现；3)文化误译作为翻译过程中文化过滤的结果。借鉴哲学阐释学的主体间性和理解对话性的概念，，本文在第四章以文化误译为途径，对文学翻译的主体和主体间性作了初步探索，指出文学翻译作品是原文作者，作品人物(就小说而台)，译者和读者交流对话的结果，交化误译是译者主体性的彰显，译者对作者的作品风格的呼应，对意向读者的迎合，以及和作品人物对话而产生的结果。有翻译就必然出现误译，主体间性是翻译的本质属性，翻译是妥协的艺术。由于科研需要及个人兴趣的原因，本文中文化误译的个案分析所采用的译例大部分选自小说《浮躁》的中文及英译本。
[Abstract]:Under the influence of source-centered theory and extreme scientism, "faithfulness" and "equivalence" have become the golden rule in the study of translation, occupying the central position of translation discourse for a long time. Misinterpretation, which is contrary to the principle of equivalence, is usually characterized as "bad translation" and is often used as a weapon of reproach. The so-called "mistake" is produced under the influence of the discourse of "source-centered theory". In this case, the translator has long been subordinate to the original author and has become a slave at the feet of the original. The study of translation has also fallen into a dilemma, confined only to the translatability or the evaluation of the merits and demerits of the translated works, and stagnated. Starting with the investigation of the concept of mistaken translation in the traditional translation theory of China and the West, and taking the development of the concepts of "faithfulness" and "equivalence" as the object, this paper discusses that the common defects of the traditional translation theories of China and the West are all the mainstream of the prescriptive method of eliminating false translation. It is pointed out that the important outlet of translatology is from prescriptive to descriptive. Then, the author expounds the origin and manifestation of mistranslation, distinguishes the difference between cultural mistranslation and mistranslation, and points out the connotation of culture and the scope and significance of research on cultural mistranslation. This paper focuses on the study of cultural mistranslation by drawing lessons from western philosophical hermeneutics and receptive aesthetics. Based on a brief review of the development of western hermeneutics, this paper summarizes the great significance of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics and its influence on reception aesthetics, and then discusses the close relationship between hermeneutics and translation and the significance of cultural mistranslation. With Heidegger's "pre-structure", Gadamer's "prejudice" theory and understanding of the universality, creativity, historical, On the basis of the relevant arguments of estheticians Ethel and Yao on reading and readers, this paper forms the main aspect of the study of cultural mistranslation: 1) the inevitability of cultural mistranslation: 2) the translation of culture as the embodiment of the translator's aesthetic creativity; 3) Cultural error translation is the result of cultural filtering in translation process. Referring to the concepts of intersubjectivity and understanding of dialogue in philosophical hermeneutics, the fourth chapter explores the subject and intersubjectivity of literary translation through the approach of cultural mistranslation. It is pointed out that literary translation is the result of communication and dialogue between the author of the original text, the characters of the work (on the basis of the novel), the translator and the reader. The error-translation is the embodiment of the translator's subjectivity, and the translator's response to the author's style and the appeal to the intended readers. And the results of dialogue with the character. If there is translation, there is bound to be mistaken translation. Intersubjectivity is the essential attribute of translation, and translation is the art of compromise. Due to the need of scientific research and personal interest, most of the examples used in the case study of cultural mistranslation in this paper are selected from the Chinese and English versions of the novel "impetuous".
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：I046

【相似文献】