段玉裁注《论语》述评

发布时间：2018-02-02 11:27

本文关键词： 《论语》《段注》段玉裁论语学训诂　出处：《辽宁师范大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文以段玉裁《说文解字注》（以下简称《段注》）中引用以及注释《论语》的部分为研究材料，以杨伯峻《论语译注》及程树德《论语集释》中注释《论语》的部分为参照，对段玉裁在“论语学史”的贡献做全面研究总结。本文首次采用统计学的研究方法，历史纵观比较的研究方法和本证与他证相结合的研究方法，对段玉裁在“论语学史”中的贡献做全面系统的研究总结。文章分三部分论述，第一章绪论部分主要对《论语》即《论语》注释情况做一简要梳理。第二章为文章主体部分，，主要介绍段注《论语》的训释，第三章简要论述段注《论语》的不足。文章的主体部分是段注《论语》的训诂成就，主要从“因声求义”、“辨析字形”、“辨识字义”、“名物考证”和“钩稽旧注”五部分进行梳理论述。“因声求义”部分又分为同音字、音近字、音转字三部分，“辨析字形”又分为古今字，异体字、假借字三部分，“辨识字义”又分为下定义、以方俗字（词）释义、递训、反训、互训、以今义释古义、释词义范围、辨析词义八部分分别论述。文章主体部分主要采用统计学、历史纵观比较和本证与他证相结合的研究方法，对段注《论语》的语言学成就进行较系统全面的疏理论述。中国现阶段的训诂学研究一方面为训诂学理论总结归纳的研究，另一方面则是对古代语言学家们的训诂是渐进性描写性的研究。近些年来，学者们对于训诂学实践的研究越来越精密化和专题化。于是产生了“论语学诠释史”或“论语学注释史”的研究。相应地也有了“孟子学史研究”。相应地对中国古代典籍的诸门学科的注释史的研究将会展开。因此，“尚书学注释史”等一系列的研究总结训诂学时间的学科也将会全面展开。这对于总结中国古代的语言学成就，对于汉语训诂学史将具有重要意义。本文的创新之处主要集中在两个方面。一方面把段注《论语》中的有关《论语》的注释材料穷尽性的梳理归纳，并首次展开段玉裁对《论语》注释成果的总结，这对于全面总结段玉裁的训诂学成就，正确科学认识段玉裁在中国语言学及“论语学史”的地位及评价，都是必要的。另一方面，黄侃认为训诂学的形式可分为专书训诂和传注训诂，以前人们都认为段玉裁三十年专注《说文》，是专书训诂实践的杰出代表，却未重视段玉裁在传注训诂中的贡献，本文首次全面而系统的总结了段玉裁在传注训诂中的贡献。这也是本文的第二大创新之处。
[Abstract]:In this paper, Duan Yu-ci "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note" (hereinafter referred to as "paragraph Note") is cited and annotated "Analects of Confucius" as the research material. Based on Yang Bojun's Analects of Analects and Cheng Shude's comments on Analects of Analects, the contribution of Duan Yu-cai to the Analects of Analects is summarized. This paper, for the first time, adopts the statistical research method, the historical comparative research method and the research method of combining this syndrome with other syndromes, and makes a comprehensive and systematic research summary of Duan Yu-cai 's contribution in the History of Analects of Confucius. The article is divided into three parts: the first chapter is the introduction of the Analects of Confucius, that is, the Analects of Analects of Analects of Confucius annotation, the second chapter is the main part of the article, mainly introduces the commentary of the Analects of Analects of the Analects of the Analects of the paragraph. The third chapter briefly discusses the deficiency of the Analects of Analects of Confucius. The main part of the article is the exegetical achievements of the Analects of Analects of the Analects of the Analects of the paragraph, mainly from "seeking meaning from the sound", "discriminating the characters" and "recognizing the meaning of the characters". "textual research of famous things" and "Yuji Old Note" are combed and discussed. The part of "seeking meaning by Sound" is divided into three parts: homonym, phonetic near character, phonetic transformation, and "differentiation of characters" is divided into ancient and modern characters and variant characters. Three parts of the false loan word, "identify the meaning" is divided into the definition of the word (word) interpretation, admonition, counter-training, mutual training, with the meaning of this interpretation of ancient meaning, interpretation of the scope of word meaning. The main part of the article mainly uses statistics, historical comparison and the combination of this syndrome and other syndromes. The linguistic achievements of the Analects of Analects of Analects of Analects of Analects of Confucius are discussed systematically and comprehensively. On the one hand, the study of exegetics in China is a summary of the theory of exegetics, on the other hand, the exegesis of ancient linguists is a gradual descriptive study. Scholars' research on the practice of exegetics has become more and more precise and monographic. As a result, there has been a study of the Analects of Analects of Analects of Confucius or the History of Analects of Analects of the Analects of Confucius. Accordingly, there has also been a study of the History of Mencius. Accordingly, the study on the annotated history of various disciplines of ancient Chinese classics will be carried out. A series of studies, such as the annotated History of Shangshu and the History of Chinese Exegetics, will also be carried out in an all-round way, which will be of great significance to summing up the linguistic achievements of ancient China and to the history of Chinese Exegetics. The innovation of this paper is mainly focused on two aspects. On the one hand, the commentary material of the Analects of Analects of the Analects of Analects is summarized. For the first time, Duan Yu-cai summarizes the achievements of Analects of Analects of Analects of Confucius, which is an overall summary of Duan Yu-cai 's achievements in exegetics and a correct and scientific understanding of Duan Yu-cai 's position and evaluation in Chinese linguistics and the "Analects History". On the other hand, Huang Kan thinks that the form of exegetics can be divided into special book exegesis and hermeneutical exegetics. In the past, it was thought that Duan Yucai focused on Shuo Wen for 30 years and was an outstanding representative of the practice of exegesis. However, the contribution of Duan Yu-cai in hermeneutics and exegesis has not been paid much attention to. This paper summarizes Duan Yu-cai 's contribution in hermeneutical exegesis for the first time, which is also the second innovation of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H131;B222

【参考文献】