韩汉语存现句对比研究

发布时间：2018-04-07 19:12

本文选题：韩汉语　切入点：存现句　出处：《吉林大学》2013年博士论文

【摘要】：我们认为，存现句并非汉语独有的句类。“某处所存在某事物”就是大多数国家或民族都需要表达的一种认识，，这种认识在各种语言中就表现为存在句式。因此，本文在语料分析的基础上，首先对韩国语存现句的性质、范围、类型等相关内容进行了界定，并建立了韩国语存现句的句式范畴。然后，对韩汉语两种语言的存现句的句法、语义进行了对比研究，试图找出韩汉语存现句之间的相同点和不同点以便能够有效地认识和掌握各自的特点。另外，我们通过大量的例句对韩国语存现句中的存在词“”、“”和辅助谓词“/”的性质进行了界定。文中在把韩汉语存现句共分为6种类型的基础上，即韩国语存现句类型为K1、K2、K3、K4、K5、K6；汉语存现句类型为C1、C2、C3、C4、C5、C6,对韩汉语存现句进行了句法、语义两个方面的对比研究。文章共分为九章内容，详细情况如下：第一章，主要介绍选题的价值和意义、选题的范围、使用的理论与方法以及全文的主要内容。第二章，主要介绍韩汉语存现句的研究现状和汉语存现句的性质、范围、分类的依据及其相关问题，并对韩国语存现句的性质、范围、类型及其相关问题进行了界定。第三章，主要分为两节内容。第一节，对比K1、C1中的NP1、VP、NP2、句法结构和句法成分以及句首为惯用型短语的K1和介词短语的C1；第二节，对比K1、C1的语义特征、语义结构、语义成分、语义指向以及句模。第四章，主要分为两节内容。第一节，对比K2、C2中的NP1、VP、NP2、句法结构和句法成分以及句首为惯用型短语的K2和介词短语的C2；第二节，对比K2、C2的语义特征、语义结构、语义成分、语义指向以及句模。第五章，主要分为两节内容。第一节，对比K3、C3中的NP1、VP、NP2、句法结构和句法成分以及句首为惯用型短语的K3和介词短语的C3；第二节，对比K3、C3的语义特征、语义结构、语义成分、语义指向以及句模。第六章，主要分为两节内容。第一节，对比K4、C4中的NP1、VP、NP2、句法结构和句法成分以及句首为惯用型短语的K4和介词短语的C4；第二节，对比K4、C4的语义特征、语义结构、语义成分、语义指向以及句模。第七章，主要分为两节内容。第一节，对比K5、C5中的NP1、VP、NP2、句法结构和句法成分以及句首为惯用型短语的K5和介词短语的C5；第二节，对比K5、C5的语义特征、语义结构、语义成分、语义指向以及句模。第八章，主要分为两节内容。第一节，对比K6、C6中的NP1、VP、NP2以及句首为惯用型短语的K6和介词短语的C6；第二节，对比K6、C6中VP的语义特征，即K6中的趋向动词、“V+趋向性辅助谓词”和C6趋向动词、“V+趋向动词”以及K6、C6中的瞬间动词。第九章，主要介绍了本文的薄弱环节和今后需要补充研究的内容。
[Abstract]:We believe that the existential sentences are not unique in Chinese sentence type. "An understanding that most countries or nations need to express the existence of something somewhere", this understanding in various languages on the performance of existing sentence. Therefore, based on the data analysis on the nature of the Korean first existential sentence the scope of related content types are defined, and the establishment of a Korean sentence category of existential sentences. Then, the Korean and Chinese two languages of existential sentences in syntactic, semantic for the comparative study, trying to find the same point of the Han Chinese existence sentences and differences between to effectively understand and master their respective characteristics.
In addition, we through a large number of examples of the Korean existential sentence in the presence of "word", "nature" and "/" auxiliary predicates are defined. In this paper, the Han Chinese existential sentence is divided into 6 types on the basis of the Korean existential sentence type is K1, K2, K3 K4, K5, K6; Chinese existential sentence type is C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, the Han Chinese existential sentences with the comparative study of the two aspects of syntax, semantics. This article is divided into nine chapters, the details are as follows:
The first chapter mainly introduces the value and significance of the topic, the scope of the topic, the theory and method used and the main content of the full text.
The second chapter mainly introduces the research status of existential sentences in Korean and Chinese, the nature, scope, classification basis and related problems of Chinese existential sentences, and defines the nature, scope, types and related problems of Korean existential sentences.
The third chapter is divided into two parts. The first section compares the NP1, VP, NP2, syntactic and syntactic components in K1, C1, and the C1 of the phrase and the prepositional phrase in idiomatic phrases. The second section compares the semantic features, semantic structure, semantic components, semantic orientation and sentence patterns of K1.
The fourth chapter is divided into two parts. The first section compares the NP1, VP, NP2, syntactic and syntactic components in K2, C2, and the C2 of the phrase and the prepositional phrase in idiomatic phrases. The second section compares the semantic features, semantic structure, semantic components, semantic orientation and sentence patterns of K2.
The fifth chapter is divided into two parts. The first section compares the NP1, VP, NP2, syntactic and syntactic components in K3, C3, and the C3 of the phrase and the prepositional phrase in idiomatic phrases. The second section compares the semantic features, semantic structure, semantic components, semantic orientation and sentence patterns of K3.
The sixth chapter is divided into two parts. The first section compares the NP1, VP, NP2, syntactic and syntactic components in K4, C4, and the C4 of the phrase and the prepositional phrase in idiomatic phrases. The second section compares the semantic features, semantic structure, semantic components, semantic orientation and sentence patterns of K4.
The seventh chapter is divided into two parts. The first section compares the NP1, VP, NP2, syntactic and syntactic components in K5, C5, and the C5 of the phrase and the prepositional phrase in idiomatic phrases. The second section compares the semantic features, semantic structure, semantic components, semantic orientation and sentence patterns of K5.
The eighth chapter is mainly divided into two sections. The first section, compared to K6, C6 NP1, VP, NP2 and sentence as idioms phrases and prepositional phrases K6 C6; the second day, compared to K6, C6 in the semantic features of VP, K6 in the directional verb, "V+ tendency of auxiliary predicates" C6 "V+ and directional verbs, directional verbs" and K6, C6 in instantaneous verbs.
The ninth chapter mainly introduces the weak link of this paper and the content that needs to be supplemented in the future.

【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146;H55

【参考文献】