系统功能语法视角下汉语小句的限定与非限定之分

发布时间：2018-02-27 17:47

本文关键词： 系统功能语法汉语限定小句汉语非限定小句　出处：《外语教学》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：学界对汉语中有无限定与非限定小句之分进行了讨论,然而一直以来并没有形成较为广泛的共识。本文从系统功能语法角度对此进行探讨,依据限定性与非限定性的本质区别——是否表示以言语者的"现在"为中心的时间指示意义,即是否表示首要时态意义,指出汉语中也存在限定与非限定小句之分。文章将汉语限定小句界定为"能够通过语法化、准语法化、词汇化或零标记手段体现首要时态或首要-次要时态的小句";将汉语非限定小句界定为两类:一类为"句法上处于从属地位,本身没有任何时态标记,其时态意义的解读依赖于级阶小句时态"的小句;一类为"句法上处于从属地位,本身具有标记次要时态意义的手段,不过其完整的时态意义解读仍然依赖于级阶小句时态"的小句。
[Abstract]:Scholars have discussed whether there are qualified and unqualified clauses in Chinese, but there has been no broad consensus. This paper discusses this from the perspective of systemic functional grammar. According to the essential difference between limitation and non-limitation, whether or not it means the "present" centered time indicator of the speaker, that is, whether it means the primary tense meaning, It is pointed out that there is also a distinction between qualified and unqualified clauses in Chinese. This paper defines Chinese qualified clauses as "capable of grammaticalization and quasi-grammaticalization." Lexicalization or zero marking means to reflect the primary tense or the primary and secondary tenses "; to define Chinese unqualified clauses as two categories: one is syntactically subordinate and does not have any tense markers, The interpretation of its tense meaning depends on the tenses of the sentence of the order of order, and one kind is the means of marking the meaning of the secondary tenses, which is subordinate to the syntactically and has itself the meaning of the secondary tenses. However, its complete interpretation of tenses still depends on the tenses of order clauses.
【作者单位】：北京外国语大学中国外语与教育研究中心;运城学院外语系;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“英汉语时间系统体现方式之系统功能视角对比研究”(项目编号:11BYY007)的部分研究成果
【分类号】：H146.3

【相似文献】