普通话特殊型语言障碍儿童与高功能自闭症儿童双及物结构对比研究

发布时间：2021-02-17 08:02

　　之前学界一般认为,特殊型语言障碍（SLI）儿童主要是语法问题,而高功能自闭症（HFA）儿童主要是语用问题。然而,近期研究发现这两类障碍儿童都存在句法和语用方面的缺陷,使两类儿童误诊率增加。如何利用语言学手段区分这两类儿童已成为国际学界的研究热点。国外学者通过对比两类障碍儿童的语言表现,为区别这两类儿童做出了贡献。但国内此类对比研究还不多见。研究发现,英语SLI儿童在双及物结构的理解和产出上都存在问题,但HFA儿童在此结构的表现仍不太清晰,目前还没有汉语这两类障碍儿童的相关研究。因此,本研究旨在探究汉语SLI儿童和HFA儿童在双及物结构上的异同,尝试为区分这两类儿童提供依据。三组年龄匹配的汉语儿童参加了本次研究,包括17名HFA儿童,18名SLI儿童和27名正常儿童。通过启动产出和图片匹配两个任务来考察三组儿童对于双及物结构的理解和产出情况并比较他们在四种双及物结构式的表现。结果显示,HFA儿童和SLI儿童存在以下两个相似之处:（1）他们在两个任务中都显著差于正常儿童;（2）产出上都受加工复杂度的影响:（a）倾向产出双宾语结构而不是与格结构,（b）多产出Subject+V+NP1+NP2... 

【文章来源】：广东外语外贸大学广东省

【文章页数】：101 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research questions
    1.3 Significance of the research
    1.4 The organization of the thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Ontological studies on ditransitive constructions
        2.1.1 The structures of ditransitive constructions
        2.1.2 Verbs in ditransitive constructions
        2.1.3 The definiteness and indefiniteness of the two objects
    2.2 Acquisition of the ditransitive construction by TDA children
        2.2.1 Studies in children speaking foreign languages
        2.2.2 Studies in Mandarin-speaking children
    2.3 Acquisition of ditransitive constructions by SLI children
        2.3.1 Studies in children speaking foreign languages
        2.3.2 Studies in Mandarin-speaking children
    2.4 Acquisition of the ditransitive construction by HFA children
    2.5 Derivational Complexity Hypothesis
    2.6 Summary
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY
    3.1 Participants
        3.1.1 The SLI group
        3.1.2 The HFA group
        3.1.3 The TDA group
    3.2 Experiment designs
        3.2.1 Production task
        3.2.2 Comprehension task
    3.3 Procedures
    3.4 Scoring criteria and data analysis
    3.5 Summary
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS
    4.1 Production task
        4.1.1 Between-group comparison
        4.1.2 Within-group comparison
        4.1.3 Analysis of non-target responses
    4.2 Comprehension task
        4.2.1 Between-group comparison
        4.2.2 Within-group comparison
        4.2.3 Error analysis
    4.3 Summary
CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION
    5.1 Discussion on the similarities between children with HFA and children with SLI
        5.1.1 Similarities in the production task
        5.1.2 Similarities in the comprehension task
    5.2 Discussion on the differences between children with HFA and children with SLI
        5.2.1 Differences in the production task
        5.2.2 Differences in the comprehension task
    5.3 Summary
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION
    6.1 Summary of the study
    6.2 Contributions of this study
    6.3 Limitations and suggestions for future studies
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
    Appendix A
    Appendix B


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]普通话早期儿童“给”字句习得个案研究[J]. 邹立志.  世界汉语教学. 2012(04)
[2]合并顺序与英汉双及物结构对比研究[J]. 何晓炜.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2008(02)
[3]双宾语结构和与格结构的关系分析[J]. 何晓炜.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2003(02)
[4]1—5岁儿童使用双宾结构状况的考察[J]. 周国光.  心理科学. 1997(02)



本文编号：3037696